A federal judge has rejected a legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s controversial $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, delivering a significant win for the administration’s immigration policy agenda. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., ruled that the fee falls within the president’s broad authority to regulate immigration, dismissing arguments from major U.S. business and academic groups.
The lawsuit was brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s largest business lobby, along with the Association of American Universities. The groups argued that the Trump administration overstepped its legal authority when it issued a September proclamation imposing the steep fee on employers seeking new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers. They claimed the measure would harm U.S. businesses, universities, and the broader economy by making it more difficult and expensive to attract global talent.
Judge Howell disagreed, concluding that existing immigration laws grant the president wide discretion to set conditions on the entry of foreign nationals into the United States. In her ruling, she emphasized that Congress has historically delegated significant power to the executive branch in matters related to immigration and national borders. As a result, the court found that the administration acted within its legal rights when it implemented the H-1B visa fee.
The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations, particularly in technology, engineering, healthcare, and academia. Supporters of the fee argue it helps protect American jobs and ensures that companies prioritize domestic workers. Critics, however, warn that the policy could discourage innovation, increase labor shortages, and reduce the global competitiveness of U.S. companies and research institutions.
The ruling marks an important development in ongoing debates over U.S. immigration policy, skilled worker visas, and executive authority. While opponents may consider further legal action or legislative solutions, the decision reinforces the Trump administration’s ability to use immigration tools, including fees and restrictions, to shape labor and economic policy.


Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
U.S. Eases Venezuela Oil Sanctions to Boost American Investment After Maduro Ouster
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive
Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Netanyahu to Meet Trump in Washington as Iran Nuclear Talks Intensify
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Illinois Joins WHO Global Outbreak Network After U.S. Exit, Following California’s Lead
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure 



