Netanyahu Requests Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
USPS Expands Electric Vehicle Fleet as Nationwide Transition Accelerates 
Trump Calls for Permanent Pause on Migration After National Guard Shooting Near White House 
Peru Moves to Declare State of Emergency at Chile Border as Migrant Tensions Rise 
Trump Administration Plans Major Rollback of Biden-Era Fuel Economy Standards 
Afghan Suspect in Deadly Shooting of National Guard Members Faces First-Degree Murder Charge 
Bolsonaro Detained Over Alleged Escape Risk After Ankle Monitor Tampering 
Germany Moves to Approve €2.9 Billion Defense Procurement Package 
UN Chief Says Gaza Operation “Fundamentally Wrong” as Concerns Over War Crimes Grow 
Trump Claims He Will Void Biden Documents Signed with Autopen 
Trump Vows Pardon for Former Honduran President as Honduras Faces Tight Election 
CFPB Reaches $1.75 Million Settlement with MoneyLion Over Military Loan Overcharges 
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
U.S. to Reduce Import Duties on South Korean Autos Under New Trade Agreement 
California Launches Portal for Reporting Alleged Misconduct by Federal Immigration Agents 
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
