U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings 
Taiwan Launches Five-Day Combat Readiness Drill Amid Rising China Military Activity 
US Senate Approves War Powers Resolution Urging Trump to End Iran Military Action 
Japan, U.S. Discuss Yen Weakness as Currency Intervention Concerns Grow 
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan Suspended as Member States Consider Removal 
South Korea Ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol Sentenced to 30 Years Over Martial Law Plot 
U.S. Launches Trade Investigation Into Germany’s Pharmaceutical Cost-Cutting Plans 
Meta Seeks Legal Shield From Child-Harm Lawsuits Amid KOSA Talks 
SEC Tokenized Stock Approval Still Expected as Regulatory Framework Advances 
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions 
NHTSA Investigates Fatal Tesla Model 3 Crash in Texas Amid Ongoing Autopilot and FSD Safety Scrutiny 
Cait Conley Wins Democratic Nomination, Sets Up Key House Battle Against Mike Lawler in New York 
Trump Administration Urges Judge to Allow UFC Event on White House Lawn 
Trump Administration Plans Deportation of Iranian Migrants to Central African Republic Under New Third-Country Deal 
Trump Team Rejects BBC Financial Data Request in $10B Lawsuit 
Russia Signals Frustration Over Unfulfilled U.S. Commitments After Alaska Summit 
US Delivers $13M Autonomous Maritime Drones to Philippines 
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
