The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has reached a $1.75 million settlement with online lender MoneyLion, resolving claims that the company overcharged military service members and their families on loans. The agreement, filed in Manhattan federal court, marks one of the agency’s final enforcement actions as it scales back operations due to budget constraints.
The CFPB originally sued MoneyLion in September 2022, alleging that the lender exceeded the legally permitted 36% interest rate cap for active-duty service members under the Military Lending Act. According to the agency, MoneyLion structured its loan program so that interest rates and mandatory membership fees combined to surpass the federal limit. The complaint also stated that MoneyLion prevented borrowers from canceling their memberships until all outstanding loan balances were paid, creating additional financial strain.
Under the settlement terms, MoneyLion will distribute compensation—primarily on a pro rata basis—to affected borrowers who took out loans between December 1, 2017, and October 11, 2024. The company has also agreed to allow borrowers to cancel memberships regardless of outstanding loan balances or unpaid fees. As is common in such settlements, MoneyLion did not admit or deny wrongdoing.
MoneyLion, a unit of Gen Digital, stated that while it disputes the CFPB’s allegations, it is “glad to put this matter behind us and focus on continuing to help Americans improve their financial lives.”
The settlement comes at a time of uncertainty for the CFPB. The Trump administration has long sought to dismantle the agency, and despite a federal judge blocking those efforts in March, acting director Russell Vought has largely halted enforcement activity amid significant funding shortfalls. Sources indicate the CFPB is attempting to shift its remaining enforcement cases to the U.S. Department of Justice as it winds down operations.
The conclusion of this case underscores ongoing scrutiny of lending practices affecting military families and highlights the shifting regulatory landscape for consumer protection in the U.S.


Rio Tinto Signs Interim Agreement With Yinhawangka Aboriginal Group Over Pilbara Mining Operations
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute
Nvidia Develops New Location-Verification Technology for AI Chips
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute
U.S. State Department Reverts to Times New Roman in Push for “Professionalism”
Senate Set for Vote on GOP Healthcare Plan as Debate Over ACA Subsidies Intensifies
Supreme Court to Weigh Trump’s Power to Remove FTC Commissioner
Federal Judge Orders Restoration of SEVIS Status for Tufts PhD Student Rumeysa Ozturk
Ireland Limits Planned Trade Ban on Israeli Settlements to Goods Only
Trump Criticizes Insurers as Debate Over Extending Obamacare Subsidies Intensifies
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand
U.S. Pressures ICC to Limit Authority as Washington Threatens New Sanctions
U.S. Greenlights Nvidia H200 Chip Exports to China With 25% Fee
Trump Administration Unveils High-Priced “Trump Gold Card” Visa Program
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise
Tunisia Protests Grow as Opposition Unites Against President Kais Saied’s Rule
United Airlines Flight to Tokyo Returns to Dulles After Engine Failure During Takeoff 



