Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand 
US Charges Two Men in Alleged Nvidia Chip Smuggling Scheme to China 
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand 
Adobe Strengthens AI Strategy Ahead of Q4 Earnings, Says Stifel 
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National AI Regulation Standard 
Moore Threads Stock Slides After Risk Warning Despite 600% Surge Since IPO 
Nvidia Develops New Location-Verification Technology for AI Chips 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges 
U.S. Greenlights Nvidia H200 Chip Exports to China With 25% Fee 
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
EssilorLuxottica Bets on AI-Powered Smart Glasses as Competition Intensifies 
SpaceX Begins IPO Preparations as Wall Street Banks Line Up for Advisory Roles 
SK Hynix Labeled “Investment Warning Stock” After Extraordinary 200% Share Surge 
For years, the gaming community – particularly those who have a penchant for shootings games – have been patiently waiting for “Borderlands 3.” This isn’t surprising since the second entry proved to be quite the hit, offering unique weapons and engaging battle mechanics.
“Borderlands 3” was poised to surpass its predecessor’s popularity after the trailer dropped earlier this month. That is until Gearbox announced that the game will be exclusive in the Epic Games Store for the first six months after its launch.
Following this reveal, the gaming community was quick to turn against “Borderlands 3,” 2K, Gearbox, and CEO Randy Pitchford. In response, Pitchford took to Twitter to explain why 2K decided to go down this route. (The lengthy explanation has been compiled in this Reddit post.)
To put briefly, Pitchford’s point was that competition between EGS and Steam is good for the gaming economy since it will break the latter’s virtual monopoly. By having “Borderlands 3” an exclusive in EGS, it essentially sends a message to Steam to give publishers and developers more competitive revenue shares for a particular title.
That’s the side of 2K. The other argument is that EGS lacks certain features that are present in Steam, with this image the go-to response whenever this discussion pops up on the web. The community has also taken their frustration on the predecessor of “Borderlands 3” as they bombed the review of the second entry.
Gamers have also expressed their ire by disliking the trailer of the first-person shooter and taking to the comment section to voice their negative opinion. So is this hate over “Borderlands 3” being exclusive in EGS for six months justified? In some ways it is, but some aspects of it have been blown out of proportion.
Some players are even saying that they will pirate “Borderlands 3” if 2K doesn’t change its decision. Hopefully, EGS can implement significant features before Sept. 13 so some of the ire of the community can be alleviated. However, it looks like the hate has never been about the lack of important features but about the questionable practices of Tencent, Epic’s investor.
