Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Innovent Biologics Shares Rally on New Eli Lilly Oncology and Immunology Deal
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Asian Stocks Slip as Tech Rout Deepens, Japan Steadies Ahead of Election
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Russian Stocks End Mixed as MOEX Index Closes Flat Amid Commodity Strength
Kroger Set to Name Former Walmart Executive Greg Foran as Next CEO
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Yen Slides as Japan Election Boosts Fiscal Stimulus Expectations
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Anta Sports Expands Global Footprint With Strategic Puma Stake
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 



