Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Gold Prices Stabilize in Asian Trade After Sharp Weekly Losses Amid Fed Uncertainty
American Airlines Plans Return to Venezuela Flights After U.S. Lifts Ban
Bob Iger Plans Early Exit as Disney Board Prepares CEO Succession Vote
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
India Budget 2025 Highlights Manufacturing Push but Falls Short of Market Expectations
SoftBank and Intel Partner to Develop Next-Generation Memory Chips for AI Data Centers
Hyundai Motor Lets Russia Plant Buyback Option Expire Amid Ongoing Ukraine War
Denso Cuts Profit Forecast Amid U.S. Tariffs and Rising Costs
RBA Raises Interest Rates by 25 Basis Points as Inflation Pressures Persist
Indian Rupee Strengthens Sharply After U.S.-India Trade Deal Announcement
Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast
UK Employers Plan Moderate Pay Rises as Inflation Pressures Ease but Persist
Nvidia’s $100 Billion OpenAI Investment Faces Internal Doubts, Report Says
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Gold and Asian Stocks Rebound as Market Volatility Eases and Global Sentiment Improves
Google Cloud and Liberty Global Forge Strategic AI Partnership to Transform European Telecom Services
Elon Musk’s SpaceX Acquires xAI in Historic Deal Uniting Space and Artificial Intelligence 



