Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Oil Tankers, Raising Venezuela Tensions and Oil Prices
Asian Stocks Edge Higher as Tech Recovers, U.S. Economic Uncertainty Caps Gains
Wall Street Futures Slip as Tech Stocks Struggle Ahead of Key US Economic Data
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Plunge on Earnings Warning Amid U.S. and China Weakness
Gold and Silver Surge as Safe Haven Demand Rises on U.S. Economic Uncertainty
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market
Chinese Robotaxi Stocks Rally as Tesla Boosts Autonomous Driving Optimism
Coca-Cola’s Proposed Sale of Costa Coffee Faces Uncertainty Amid Price Dispute
Ford Takes $19.5 Billion Charge as EV Strategy Shifts Toward Hybrids
Gold and Silver Prices Dip as Markets Await Key U.S. Economic Data
Oil Prices Rebound as U.S.-Venezuela Tensions Offset Oversupply Concerns
United Airlines Tokyo-Bound Flight Returns to Dulles After Engine Failure
Woolworths Faces Fresh Class Action Over Alleged Underpayments, Shares Slide
Korea Zinc Plans $6.78 Billion U.S. Smelter Investment With Government Partnership
Asian Fund Managers Turn More Optimistic on Growth but Curb Equity Return Expectations: BofA Survey
Oil Prices Rebound as Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Venezuelan Tankers
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit 



