Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
Coupang Apologizes After Massive Data Breach Affecting 33.7 Million Users 
Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX 
Samsung Launches Galaxy Z TriFold to Elevate Its Position in the Foldable Smartphone Market 
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation 
Visa to Move European Headquarters to London’s Canary Wharf 
Banks Consider $38 Billion Funding Boost for Oracle, Vantage, and OpenAI Expansion 
Microchip Technology Boosts Q3 Outlook on Strong Bookings Momentum 
Momenta Quietly Moves Toward Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising China-U.S. Tensions 
ByteDance Unveils New AI Voice Assistant for ZTE Smartphones 
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 
Apple Alerts EU Regulators That Apple Ads and Maps Meet DMA Gatekeeper Thresholds 
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative 
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO 
GM Issues Recall for 2026 Chevrolet Silverado Trucks Over Missing Owner Manuals 
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities 
Netflix Nearing Major Deal to Acquire Warner Bros Discovery Assets 
Apple has been tight-lipped about its long-rumored AR/VR headset, but recent trademark filings might provide more clues about the product. The company, through law firms and shell corporations, has reportedly filed trademark applications for several brands carrying the name “Reality.”
Trademark applications for the names “Reality One,” “Reality Pro,” and “Reality Processor” were filed in Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, Europe, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Uruguay, Bloomberg reported. While the parties that filed these applications are not Apple, the publication noted that this is a familiar strategy Apple has used in the past to register a trademark for an upcoming product.
The same report found that the filings for the “Reality” names were filed in New Zealand by the Simpson Grierson law firm. Bloomberg recalled the same firm was used by the iPhone maker to file for the name Apple Sales New Zealand. Similar patterns were observed in the applications filed in Canada and the US.
The trademarks were not granted yet at the time of the report, so there is still a chance that Apple would end up not using these names for its AR/VR headset or any related products. But this would not be the first time that the name “Reality” has been attached to the headset. Apple was also rumored to have filed a trademark for the name “realityOS” using a similar strategy for the more recent filings. It has since sparked speculations that the Apple AR/VR headset’s operating system could be named realityOS.
While nothing is certain yet with regards to the Apple AR/VR headset branding, the names appear to follow familiar brand strategies for other Apple products. And this might provide some clues on how Apple could later use these names. The company usually reserves the name “Pro” for its higher-end products, such as iPhone Pro, iPad Pro, and MacBook Pro. Meanwhile, “One” is famously used for the Apple One subscription.
The “Reality Processor” name is speculated to be used for a potential chip specifically designed for the Apple AR/VR headset. Bloomberg has also reported that the tech giant had been considering using the M2 chip for the headset. But if the product is designed to watch media content in VR, it would not be surprising if Apple introduces a co-processor for additional computing power for the graphical requirement of VR and AR content.
The Apple AR/VR headset has appeared in more headlines in recent months, but it is not expected to be included in Apple’s “Far out” event on Sept. 7. But reports suggest it could be released sometime in 2023.
Photo by Stefanos Nt on Unsplash
