IKEA Launches First New Zealand Store, Marking Expansion Into Its 64th Global Market 
Netflix’s Bid for Warner Bros Discovery Aims to Cut Streaming Costs and Reshape the Industry 
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
IKEA Expands U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Tariffs and Supply Chain Strategy Shift 
Visa to Move European Headquarters to London’s Canary Wharf 
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 
Airbus Faces Pressure After November Deliveries Dip Amid Industrial Setback 
GM Issues Recall for 2026 Chevrolet Silverado Trucks Over Missing Owner Manuals 
Rio Tinto Raises 2025 Copper Output Outlook as Oyu Tolgoi Expansion Accelerates 
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation 
Airline Loyalty Programs Face New Uncertainty as Visa–Mastercard Fee Settlement Evolves 
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies 
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative 
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO 
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off 
AT&T Inc is on the headlines after Network Apps LLC, and others took the American multinational telecom conglomerate to court on Jan. 26. The complainant filed for alleged theft of its patented technology.
The lawsuit vs. the telecom company
To be more specific, based on the documents filed at the New York Southern District Court, the case against AT&T Inc is about the Network Apps and other plaintiffs’ claims of patent infringement and breach of contract.
Reuters reported that the plaintiffs sued AT&T for at least $1.35 billion and claiming that the telecom giant ripped them off by stealing Network Apps’ patented “twinning” technology. This is something that allows various types of devices to respond to calls placed on a single phone number. In simpler terms, this technology can re-route calls to multiple devices.
The plaintiffs are being represented by Browne George Ross O'Brien Annaguey & Ellis, and Cadwell Clonts & Reeder law firms. AT&T’s lawyers have yet to appear in court to represent the respondent. As posted on Law.com, the lawsuit was filed as Network Apps, LLC et al v. AT&T Inc. et al. case.
How the allegation against AT&T started
The lawsuit stemmed from the discarded joint development project between Network Apps LLC and AT&T. The complainants alleged that in 2014, they were supposed to work with the telecom company, so they have discussed the joint development and licensing agreements for technology.
The agreement was ditched, and according to the complainants, this happened after AT&T realized it would be obligated to pay a lot in royalties as the market for smart devices was booming. However, they have learned that AT&T included the patented technology in its product called the NumberSync, a year after they abandoned the joining development agreement.
In the complaint, they stated that NumberSync utilizes the same concept and architecture of their “twinning” technology. It was claimed that AT&T just made small “cosmetic changes” and stated that the creators of the service are the AT&T employees who worked with Network Apps and the others.
Network Apps said it has not received any royalties since 2015, which is required based on laws. The company is asking for $450 million as damage compensation and wants the amount tripled to show AT&T’s so-called “willful and egregious infringement” and royalties for possible infringements in the future.
