U.S. President Donald Trump indicated on Sunday that he expects to play a direct role in determining whether the proposed merger between Netflix and Warner Brothers will move forward, raising new questions about regulatory scrutiny surrounding one of the entertainment industry’s biggest potential deals. Speaking to reporters as he arrived at the Kennedy Center for its annual awards ceremony, Trump said he believes the size and influence of the combined company could create concerns about market concentration and competition.
His comments followed Netflix’s announcement on Friday that it had reached an agreement to acquire Warner Bros Discovery’s television, film studio, and streaming assets in a massive $72 billion deal. If approved, the acquisition would give Netflix control over highly valuable entertainment properties, significantly expanding its reach in Hollywood and strengthening its position in the global streaming market. Industry analysts have already noted that the merger could reshape the competitive landscape by merging a leading streaming giant with one of the most iconic content producers in the world.
Although Trump did not express a clear stance on whether the merger should ultimately be approved, he emphasized that the potential dominance of the merged entity could draw regulatory attention. “That’s going to be for some economists to tell… But it is a big market share. There’s no question it could be a problem,” he said, suggesting that antitrust regulators may need to evaluate whether the deal poses risks to fair competition, consumer choice, or media diversity.
With the entertainment industry already undergoing rapid consolidation, this proposed merger is likely to face intense examination in Washington. Trump’s assertion that he will be “involved in that decision” underscores the political significance of the deal and signals that federal oversight could play a decisive role in determining its outcome. As the regulatory review process unfolds, both companies and industry observers are preparing for what could become one of the most consequential media rulings in years.


Pulp are back and more wistfully Britpop than before
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile
Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace
Oscars 2025: who will likely win, who should win, and who barely deserves to be there
Trump Rejects Putin’s New START Extension Offer, Raising Fears of a New Nuclear Arms Race
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
UAE Plans Temporary Housing Complex for Displaced Palestinians in Southern Gaza
Gulf Sovereign Funds Unite in Paramount–Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
FCC Chair Brendan Carr to Face Senate Oversight After Controversy Over Jimmy Kimmel Show
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Trump to Pardon Reality Stars Todd and Julie Chrisley After Tax Fraud Conviction 



