On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.


SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 



