On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.


Chalco Stock Surges as Q1 2025 Profit Forecast Jumps Up to 58%
Kia Cuts EV Sales Target for 2030 Amid Slowing Demand and U.S. Policy Shifts
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute
Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis
Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy
TSMC Posts Strong Q1 2025 Revenue, Riding AI Chip Demand Wave
Ford Issues Major Recall on Over 422,000 Vehicles Due to Windshield Wiper Defect
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs
Apple's Foldable iPhone Faces Engineering Setbacks, Mass Production Timeline at Risk
Bank of America Identifies Top Asia-Pacific Semiconductor Stocks Poised for AI-Driven Growth
Abbott Laboratories Ordered to Pay $53 Million in Premature Infant Formula Lawsuit
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles 



