WILMINGTON, Del., March 04, 2016 -- Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:
- Do you, or did you, own shares of Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE)?
- Did you purchase your shares between May 14, 2015 and November 23, 2015, inclusive?
- Did you lose money in your investment?
Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. announces that a complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Sempra Energy (“Sempra” or the “Company”) (NYSE:SRE) between May 14, 2015 and November 23, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”).
If you purchased shares of Sempra during the Class Period, or purchased shares prior to the Class Period and still hold Sempra, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120, Wilmington, DE 19803 at (888) 969-4242; by e-mail to [email protected]; or at: http://rigrodskylong.com/investigations/sempra-energy-sre.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects. As a result of defendants’ alleged false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.
According to the Complaint, on October 23, 2015, Sempra’s subsidiary SoCalGas discovered a natural gas leak from the Company’s Aliso Canyon natural gas storage facility near the Porter Ranch neighborhood in Los Angeles (the “Porter Ranch Leak”). Then, on November 23, 2015, displaced Porter Ranch residents filed a class action lawsuit against SoCalGas, seeking damages and an order requiring SoCalGas to disclose information related to the health risks associated with the Porter Ranch Leak.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 2, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
CONTACT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire Peter Allocco (888) 969-4242 (516) 683-3516 Fax: (302) 654-7530 [email protected] http://www.rigrodskylong.com


SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 



