WILMINGTON, Del., March 04, 2016 -- Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:
- Do you, or did you, own shares of Match Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:MTCH)?
- Did you purchase your shares pursuant and/or traceable to the initial public offering on or about November 18, 2015?
- Did you lose money in your investment?
Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. announces that a complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Match Group, Inc. (“Match Group” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:MTCH) pursuant or traceable to its initial public offering (“IPO”) commenced on or about November 18, 2015, alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 against the Company, the sponsors of the IPO, and certain of the Company’s officers (the “Complaint”).
If you purchased shares of Match Group in connection with its IPO, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120, Wilmington, DE 19803 at (888) 969-4242; by e-mail to [email protected]; or at: http://rigrodskylong.com/investigations/match-group-inc-mtch.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects. As a result of defendants’ alleged false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.
According to the Complaint, on or about November 18, 2015, Match Group conducted its IPO of 33,333,333 shares at $12.00 per share for total proceeds of approximately $400 million. Then, on February 2, 2016, Match Group revealed to investors a decline in total user growth and per-user revenue, and the cannibalization of users and revenues across competing platforms. Further, the Company disclosed that its net income has consistently fallen and that there had been a decline in revenue in their Princeton Review segment.
On this news, shares in Match Group dropped over 19% in the following days, closing at $9.76 per share on February 4, 2016, on heavy trading volume.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 26, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
CONTACT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire Peter Allocco (888) 969-4242 (516) 683-3516 Fax: (302) 654-7530 [email protected] http://www.rigrodskylong.com


American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 



