Coles “Down Down” Ruling Sparks Fresh Scrutiny of Australian Supermarket Pricing 
Ukraine Begins Major POW Swap as 205 Soldiers Return from Russian Captivity 
Oil Prices Climb as Strait of Hormuz Tensions and Supply Concerns Persist 
Judge Rules DOGE Humanities Grant Cuts Unconstitutional 
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice 
Rubio Urges China to Release Jimmy Lai and Political Prisoners 
Havana Protests Erupt as Cuba Faces Severe Blackouts and Fuel Crisis 
Judge Rules Use of Military Lawyers in Civilian Prosecutions Is Lawful 
Judge Dismisses Elon Musk’s Fraud Claims Against OpenAI, Trial to Proceed on Remaining Allegations 
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case 
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
U.S. Urges China to Help Curb Iran’s Actions in Gulf, Rubio Says 
US Trade Court Blocks Trump’s 10% Global Tariffs 
Russian Border Drone Attack Leaves One Dead in Belgorod Region 
TikTok Nears $400 Million Settlement With Trump Administration Over Child Privacy Lawsuit 
US-China Trade Talks Sideline Chip Export Controls as Nvidia China Sales Draw Attention 
Starmer Faces Leadership Crisis as Wes Streeting Reportedly Considers Challenge 
A leading historic preservation group has filed a lawsuit against U.S. President Donald Trump and several federal agencies in an effort to block construction of a proposed $300 million ballroom at the White House site, raising significant legal and preservation concerns. The lawsuit, filed Friday in federal court in Washington, D.C., challenges the demolition of the White House’s East Wing and the rapid advancement of the 90,000-square-foot ballroom project without what the group says are legally required reviews and approvals.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon confirmed he will hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s request for a temporary order to stop construction. According to the nonprofit organization, the project moved forward without public input and failed to comply with federal statutes that mandate consultations with the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts before altering historically significant federal property.
The lawsuit argues that no president has the unilateral authority to demolish parts of the White House without oversight, regardless of party affiliation. The group is also seeking to pause construction until environmental impact reviews are completed, relevant federal commissions approve the plans, and Congress formally authorizes the project.
The ballroom is part of a series of major changes President Trump has made to the White House since returning to office in January. These changes reportedly include extensive gold décor added to the Oval Office and the replacement of the Rose Garden lawn with a paved patio reminiscent of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.
In response, White House spokesman Davis Ingle stated that President Trump has full legal authority to modernize, renovate, and enhance the White House, noting that past presidents have also made significant changes to the historic residence.
Carol Quillen, president and CEO of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, emphasized that public engagement is essential when altering a symbol of American democracy. She said that inviting public comment reflects respect for the nation’s heritage and helps ensure changes leave a lasting and appropriate legacy.
