In a final blow to Nike Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear its appeal against a patent decision favoring Adidas, effectively closing a long-standing legal battle over sneaker technology patents.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court reportedly rejected Nike’s appeal, and since it is already the highest tribunal, the long-standing legal battle with Adidas is now considered a solved case.
As per JD Journal, the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Nike, wherein it is seeking to overturn the decision of the Patent Office court. The verdict from the lower court was upheld by the bureau’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and apparently, the justices at the higher court made the same decision as well.
It was mentioned that the lawsuits between Nike and Adidas have been going on for years as they have been fighting over a number of patents related to the application of technology in their respective shoe designs. In fact, in 2012, the German sneaker and sportswear manufacturer petitioned the patent office tribunal to nullify one of Nike’s patents involving the seamless knitted upper parts of the sneakers.
At that time, the tribunal accepted the Air Jordan maker’s request to cancel parts of its patent but did not allow the firm to revise the patent. It was explained that it was declined based on the fact that there was an earlier publication that covered the same innovation which Nike is proposing as a substitute for some patent elements.
Reuters reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals, specializing in patent disputes, sent the case back to the board two times and finally dismissed Nike’s third appeal last year. The company told the court in March that the board should not have been allowed to scrap a substitute patent element as they please, based on reasonings that Adidas did not bring up at the time.
In any case, the latest decision of the Supreme Court not to review the case put a legal end to the proceedings - with finality. This is because the outcome has left Nike with no other way to pursue its patent case against Adidas in the U.S. judicial system.
Photo by: Lennart Uecker/Unsplash


Elon Musk Wins Reinstatement of Historic Tesla Pay Package After Delaware Supreme Court Ruling
Yen Near Lows as Markets Await Bank of Japan Rate Decision, Euro Slips After ECB Signals Caution
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review
China Keeps Benchmark Lending Rates Steady as Economic Outlook Remains Cautious
Toyota to Sell U.S.-Made Camry, Highlander, and Tundra in Japan From 2026 to Ease Trade Tensions
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track
FedEx Beats Q2 Earnings Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook Despite Stock Dip
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland
BoE Set to Cut Rates as UK Inflation Slows, but Further Easing Likely Limited
Yen Slides as BOJ Caution Undercuts Rate Hike Impact
U.S. Stock Futures Edge Higher as Micron Earnings Boost AI Sentiment Ahead of CPI Data
New Zealand Business Confidence Hits 30-Year High as Economic Outlook Improves
Asian Markets Rebound as Tech Rally Lifts Wall Street, Investors Brace for BOJ Rate Hike
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group
Austan Goolsbee Signals Potential for More Fed Rate Cuts as Inflation Shows Improvement
China’s Power Market Revamp Fuels Global Boom in Energy Storage Batteries 



