The lack of regulation has always been a major contributing factor to the volatility of cryptocurrency. And Lithuania has been among the countries that are trying to put up the legal groundwork for the nascent technology.
In an announcement released on June 8, Lithuania issued nearly encompassing guidelines on initial coin offerings (ICO). Experts are hailing the document as a great new path that would usher in “certainty and transparency” regarding blockchain and its would-be role in the country’s economy, Cointelegraph reported.
The document was green-lighted by Minister of Finance Vilius Šapoka following the government’s gathering of banks, ICO firms, and other entities operating in the crypto market. In his opening statement, Šapoka highlighted how Luthiania is in a great position in the crypto sphere given that it has already made considerable progress in creating a legal foundation for fostering the new economy’s growth.
“We are one of the first ones in Europe who prepared comprehensive guidelines on a legal framework for ICO projects covering regulatory as well as taxation and accounting,” the minister said. “We acknowledge that the brave new crypto economy world is here to stay, this is why we encourage and invite its participants to innovate and create in Lithuania.”
Among the issues tackled by the comprehensive document were taxation, accounting, anti-money laundering (AML), and whether ICO is considered a security or not. The last part is important since there’s still confusion on where ICO falls.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Jay Clayton recently gave a talk on the subject and pointed out that most, if not all, ICOs are considered securities. He reasoned that if an investor gives money to a crypto company and in return gets a profit out of that investment, then that is considered a security and should be regulated. However, he pointed out that Bitcoin is most likely not a security since its use revolves around the replacement of a sovereign currency.
For Lithuania, what constitutes a security will be determined by an ICO's ability to “[grant] profits or governance rights.” The ultimate goal of this outlining is to create a clear distinction as to what ICO is to avoid any misunderstanding among the government, stakeholders, and ICO firms.


Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy
MetaX IPO Soars as China’s AI Chip Stocks Ignite Investor Frenzy
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies
Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges
Apple Explores India for iPhone Chip Assembly as Manufacturing Push Accelerates
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters
Moore Threads Stock Slides After Risk Warning Despite 600% Surge Since IPO
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand
Biren Technology Targets Hong Kong IPO to Raise $300 Million Amid China’s AI Chip Push
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National AI Regulation Standard
SpaceX Edges Toward Landmark IPO as Elon Musk Confirms Plans
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns 



