NEW YORK, June 09, 2017 -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. securities (NASDAQ:ITCI) from August 12, 2014 through April 28, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important July 11, 2017 lead plaintiff deadline in the first filed class action commenced by Rosen Law Firm. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Intra-Cellular Therapies investors under the federal securities laws.
To join the Intra-Cellular Therapies class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1111.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action.
NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.
According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) findings related to toxicity in animals treated with lumateperone (ITI-007) were observed; (2) these findings posed an additional safety concern regarding lumateperone; and (3) as a result, Intra-Cellular Therapies’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 11, 2017. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1111.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim or Kevin Chan of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected].
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Since 2014, Rosen Law Firm has been ranked #2 in the nation by Institutional Shareholder Services for the number of securities class action settlements annually obtained for investors.
Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. Kevin Chan, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.rosenlegal.com


TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment
Novo Nordisk Warns of Profit Decline as Wegovy Faces U.S. Price Pressure and Rising Competition
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Anthropic Eyes $350 Billion Valuation as AI Funding and Share Sale Accelerate
Boeing Signals Progress on Delayed 777X Program With Planned April First Flight
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling 



