Trump Warns Venezuela’s Delcy Rodríguez of Severe Consequences After Maduro Seizure 
Maduro Capture Sparks Military Alert Across Venezuela 
US Warns of Higher Tariffs on India Over Russian Oil Imports as Trade Tensions Persist 
Cuba Condemns U.S. Actions in Venezuela as Tensions Rise in the Region 
China Rejects U.S. Role as “World’s Judge” After Maduro’s Arrest 
North Korea Launches Ballistic Missile as Regional Tensions Rise Ahead of Diplomatic Talks 
Maduro’s Capture Deepens Venezuela’s Political Crisis as Power Struggle Intensifies 
Trump Signals Potential U.S. Action Against Colombia and Iran After Venezuela Operation 
Myanmar Junta Announces Amnesty for Over 6,000 Prisoners on Independence Day Amid Ongoing Crisis 
Trump Supporters Applaud Maduro Capture as Analysts Warn of Political Risks 
Trump Signals Potential U.S. Action Against Colombia and Iran After Venezuela Operation 
Cuba Declares National Mourning After Citizens Killed in U.S. Raid Targeting Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro 
Venezuela Faces Political Upheaval After U.S. Detains President Nicolas Maduro 
Denmark and Greenland Reject Trump’s Renewed Calls to Take Over Greenland 
U.S. Capture of Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro Sparks Global Legal Debate at the United Nations 
Maduro Set for U.S. Court Appearance After Dramatic Capture as Trump Signals Tougher Venezuela Stance 
International reactions poured in following Saturday’s U.S. military strikes on Venezuela, with governments and global leaders sharply divided over the legality, consequences, and geopolitical impact of the operation. The strikes, which reportedly involved Venezuelan territory and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, have intensified debate around sovereignty, international law, and the future of Venezuela’s political transition.
A joint statement from Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Spain, and Uruguay expressed “deep concern and rejection” of the unilateral military action, warning it violated fundamental principles of international law and endangered regional peace and civilian lives. Similar condemnation came from the United Nations, where Secretary-General António Guterres cautioned that the developments set a dangerous precedent and emphasized the need to uphold the UN Charter.
European leaders largely echoed these concerns. France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Denmark, Norway, Slovakia, and the European Commission stressed that any solution in Venezuela must respect international law and favor a peaceful, democratic transition. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed the UK was not involved and reiterated the importance of establishing facts while respecting international norms. Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, and South Africa also called for restraint, diplomacy, and multilateral engagement.
Latin American responses were mixed. Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva condemned the bombings as an unacceptable affront to sovereignty, while Chile, Colombia, Uruguay, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Mexico rejected foreign military intervention and urged dialogue. In contrast, Argentina’s President Javier Milei and Ecuador’s President Daniel Noboa welcomed the developments, framing them as the collapse of an authoritarian regime and a victory for democracy in the region.
Global powers Russia, China, Iran, Belarus, and Nicaragua strongly condemned the U.S. action, labeling it armed aggression and a blatant violation of sovereignty, with calls for urgent UN Security Council action. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, however, praised U.S. President Donald Trump for what he described as bold leadership in defense of freedom and justice.
As the international community reacts, the situation underscores deep divisions over the use of force, the interpretation of international law, and the path forward for Venezuela’s political future, with many urging de-escalation and a return to diplomacy.
