Volkswagen Launches €28,000 ID. Cross EV as Europe’s Electric Vehicle Demand Accelerates 
Nippon Paint Reportedly Offers Up to €7.5 Billion for Akzo Nobel Decorative Paints Business 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States 
Arm Stock Falls After HSBC Downgrade, Citing Limited Near-Term AI Upside 
Stellantis Q2 Vehicle Shipments Rise 10% as North America Drives Growth 
Taiwan Mangoes Head to Europe as Premium Fruit Exports Expand 
Samsung to Launch First Yongin Chip Plant by 2029 as South Korea Speeds Up Semiconductor Hub 
SoftBank Corp Partners With Sierra to Expand AI Customer Support Across Japan 
BHP Faces Major Port Hedland Strike as Labor Talks Stall Ahead of Production Report 
Apple Intelligence Cleared for China as Alibaba and Baidu AI Power iPhone Features 
Mastercard Explores Sale of Majority Stake in UK Payments Firm Vocalink: Report 
Deutsche Bank Fined A$2 Million by ASIC Over OTC Derivatives Reporting Errors 
Rio Tinto Reports Strong Q2 Iron Ore Sales, Maintains 2026 Production Outlook 
Yaskawa Electric Shares Slide as Weak Profit Overshadows Strong AI Demand 
SK Hynix Shares Drop After Strong Nasdaq Debut Despite $26 Billion ADR Listing 
Stripe, Advent Offer $53 Billion Deal to Acquire PayPal: Reuters 
SEB Q2 Profit Rises on Strong Lending, Record Fee Income, Announces New Share Buyback 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Jan. 15, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:GPRO) in the United District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased GoPro securities between July 21, 2015 through January 13, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that Defendants issued materially false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) GoPro was experiencing weak sales of its HERO line of cameras; (2) GoPro was experiencing weak HERO4 Session sales at the time the third Quarter guidance was announced; (3) GoPro’s third quarter 2015 guidance was based on the assumption that GoPro would be able to sell a significant additional amount of HERO4 Session cameras; (4) GoPro’s third and fourth quarter 2015 guidance was inflated and unrealistic; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ statements about GoPro’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 14, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
