Alphabet Earnings Surge on AI Growth, Cloud Revenue, and Strong Search Performance 
Qualcomm Stock Surges Despite Weak Guidance After Q2 2026 Earnings Beat 
Novartis Q1 2026 Earnings Miss Expectations as Generic Competition Pressures Sales 
Meta Raises 2026 Capex Outlook Amid AI Spending Surge, Shares Drop After Earnings 
Amazon Stock Dips Despite Record Earnings as AI Infrastructure Spending Surges 
Starbucks Raises 2026 Outlook as Turnaround Strategy Boosts Sales and Earnings 
Why Paycom Was Named a 2026 Platinum Employer on the Where You Work Matters List 
Pershing Square Raises $5 Billion in Landmark U.S. IPO and Share Placement 
China’s Ultra-Cheap EV Boom: Why Electric Cars Cost Far Less Than in the U.S. 
GameStop Eyes eBay Acquisition as Stock Prices Surge After Hours 
Robinhood Q1 Earnings Miss Expectations, Stock Drops After Hours 
AstraZeneca Q1 2026 Earnings Surge on Strong Oncology and Rare Disease Drug Sales 
T-Mobile Beats Q1 Earnings Expectations on Strong Postpaid Growth 
Micro Systemation Reports Q1 Loss Amid Strategic Investments and Revenue Growth 
WuXi AppTec Stock Surges on Strong Q1 Earnings and CRDMO Demand Growth 
Apple Q2 2026 Earnings Surge as iPhone 17 Sales Drive Record Revenue 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Jan. 15, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:GPRO) in the United District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased GoPro securities between July 21, 2015 through January 13, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that Defendants issued materially false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) GoPro was experiencing weak sales of its HERO line of cameras; (2) GoPro was experiencing weak HERO4 Session sales at the time the third Quarter guidance was announced; (3) GoPro’s third quarter 2015 guidance was based on the assumption that GoPro would be able to sell a significant additional amount of HERO4 Session cameras; (4) GoPro’s third and fourth quarter 2015 guidance was inflated and unrealistic; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ statements about GoPro’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 14, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
