RBA Expected to Raise Interest Rates by 25 Basis Points in February, ANZ Forecast Says 
JPMorgan Lifts Gold Price Forecast to $6,300 by End-2026 on Strong Central Bank and Investor Demand 
BTC Flat at $89,300 Despite $1.02B ETF Exodus — Buy the Dip Toward $107K? 
Asian Markets Wobble as AI Fears Rattle Stocks, Oil and Gold Rebound 
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding 
Bank of Japan Likely to Delay Rate Hike Until July as Economists Eye 1% by September 
RBA Raises Interest Rates by 25 Basis Points as Inflation Pressures Persist 
Bank of England Expected to Hold Interest Rates at 3.75% as Inflation Remains Elevated 
MAS Holds Monetary Policy Steady as Strong Growth Raises Inflation Risks 
Fed Confirms Rate Meeting Schedule Despite Severe Winter Storm in Washington D.C. 
Numerous elements that influence the shift in the SNB’s FX stance, namely:
1) Economic performance is satisfactory and inflation continues to normalize (the rate of CPI inflation has increased by 1.5% from the 2015 low, putting it 0.4% above its 5Y average.
2) The SNB’s FX and gold reserves increased by 17% of GDP in 2016 to 114%. The SNB needs to be mindful of the fiscal risk inherent in a balance sheet of this size, especially considering potential investment losses from a trend to higher bond yields.
3) The Trump Administration is less accepting of FX manipulation. But what has US FX policy got to do with a small economy like Switzerland? The answer is that while small, Switzerland has a long and enduring history of FX intervention such that it is now the third largest holder of FX reserves (6% of global reserves for an economy which accounts for 0.9% of global GDP) and the fourth largest holder of UST (excluding offshore centres). Importantly also, Switzerland is one of only two countries that exceeds the threshold the US Treasury has set as prima facie evidence of currency manipulation -persistent, one-sided FX intervention exceeding 2% of GDP (Switzerland is at 10%, Taiwan 2.5%).
SNB intervention may be regarded as a legitimate expression of domestic monetary policy by some observers, but could equally be construed as manipulation by others. In view of this, it’s not an entirely fanciful suggestion that the SNB might be tapering intervention in order to the guard against the risk of being cited by the US Treasury as a currency manipulator.
Bullish scenarios:
1) The SNB continues to taper but at a faster pace.
2) The US Treasury cites Switzerland as a currency manipulator (April report?).
3) President Le Pen.
Bearish scenarios:
1) 3-4 Fed hikes encourages heavier capital outflows and a resumption of CHF funded carry trades.
2) Breakdown of EU talks over restrictions on free movement of labor.
