U.S. Appeals Court Rules California Open Carry Firearm Ban Unconstitutional 
Supreme Court to Hear Cisco Appeal on Alien Tort Statute and Human Rights Liability 
Venezuela Supreme Court Appoints Delcy Rodríguez as Acting President After Nicolás Maduro Detention 
U.S. Launches Phase Two of Gaza Peace Plan Amid Ongoing Ceasefire Challenges 
South Korea Prosecutor Alleges Former First Lady Kim Keon Hee Abused Power for Bribes 
U.S. Appeals Court Allows Trump Administration to Enforce Medicaid Funding Ban on Planned Parenthood 
Trump Signals Caution on Iran Protests as U.S. Military Intervention Risks Grow 
Amazon Reviews Supplier Costs as U.S.–China Tariffs Ease 
Disney Agrees to $10 Million Settlement Over Child Privacy Violations on YouTube 
Trump Signals Confidence China Could Open Markets to U.S. Goods Amid Rising Global Tensions 
Trump Signals Confidence in Potential Greenland Agreement Amid Security Talks 
Trump Administration Signals Tougher Stance on Citizenship Revocation for Fraud Convictions 
FTC Blocks Edwards Lifesciences’ JenaValve Acquisition in Major Antitrust Ruling 
Chevron Set to Expand Venezuela Operations as U.S. Signals Shift on Oil Sanctions 
Taiwan Issues Arrest Warrant for OnePlus CEO Over Alleged Illegal Recruitment Activities 
Trump Administration Weighs Diplomacy and Military Options as Iran Nuclear Tensions Rise 
U.S. Lawmakers Raise Alarm Over Trump Approval of Nvidia AI Chip Sales to China 
A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from withholding roughly $80 million in federal funding used to administer Minnesota’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, amid a legal dispute over alleged fraud and eligibility reviews.
U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino ruled during a hearing in St. Paul that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) likely acted illegally by giving Minnesota only 30 days, until January 15, to review the eligibility of about 100,000 SNAP households. The USDA had warned it would stop reimbursing half of the state’s administrative costs if the deadline was not met, citing concerns over widespread fraud linked to social-welfare programs in Minnesota.
Judge Provinzino said the USDA failed to justify why such an accelerated review was necessary and noted that federal law generally prohibits states from reviewing SNAP recipients’ eligibility more than once per year. She added that Minnesota’s existing operational plan, which limits reviews, had already been approved by the USDA. In her ruling, the judge stated that the federal agency appeared to be pushing the state to violate federal law and its own regulations.
The court order prevents the USDA from withholding the disputed funding while the lawsuit proceeds, including approximately $20 million for the first quarter of the year that the agency had indicated would not be released. The ruling does not affect the monthly SNAP benefits paid directly to recipients, which will continue uninterrupted.
Minnesota officials argued the USDA’s actions were politically motivated, pointing to President Donald Trump’s long-running conflicts with Democratic leaders in the state, including Governor Tim Walz. State attorneys said the funding threat was part of a broader pattern of federal pressure against Minnesota.
The U.S. Department of Justice countered that Minnesota’s past issues with other federally funded programs justified the USDA’s response and claimed the state could temporarily cover the shortfall with its own funds.
SNAP has remained a contentious issue nationally, particularly during Trump’s presidency. The program serves low-income Americans earning less than 130% of the federal poverty level, with maximum monthly benefits in fiscal year 2026 set at $298 for one person and $546 for a two-person household.
