A federal appeals court has blocked a Trump administration initiative that would have required hospitals serving low-income Americans to pay full prices upfront for certain high-cost prescription drugs before receiving rebates later, marking a significant development in U.S. healthcare and drug pricing policy.
On Wednesday, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request from President Donald Trump’s administration to pause an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maine. That injunction halted a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) program that would have fundamentally changed how safety-net hospitals purchase some of the most expensive medications covered under Medicare drug price negotiations.
The lawsuit was brought by the American Hospital Association (AHA) along with several healthcare providers, who argued that the new drug pricing model represented a sudden and harmful departure from decades of established policy. Under the long-standing 340B Drug Pricing Program, drugmakers have been required to offer upfront discounts to hospitals that serve vulnerable and low-income populations. The hospitals warned that replacing upfront discounts with a rebate-based system would impose hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs and strain already limited resources.
The blocked policy would have applied to the first 10 medications selected for Medicare price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, passed during President Joe Biden’s administration. These drugs include widely used treatments such as Eliquis, a blood thinner sold by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb; Xarelto, produced by Johnson & Johnson; and Merck & Co.’s diabetes drug Januvia.
HRSA argued that its 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program, announced in July, was designed to prevent drug manufacturers from providing duplicate discounts, which they are permitted to avoid under the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the pilot, manufacturers could charge hospitals wholesale prices and issue rebates afterward to align with negotiated Medicare prices.
However, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker ruled that HRSA failed to properly assess the impact of the rebate model on rural and safety-net hospitals, violating the Administrative Procedure Act. His December 29 injunction stopped the program from taking effect on January 1, a decision now upheld by the appeals court.


FDA Biologics Chief Vinay Prasad to Leave Agency in April Amid Policy Disputes
Trump Doubts Iran Mining Reports as Strait of Hormuz Tensions Escalate
UK Regulators Demand Social Media Platforms Strengthen Children's Age Verification
Nissan, Uber, and Wayve Team Up to Launch Robotaxi Pilot in Tokyo
ICE Arrests Colombian Journalist in Tennessee, Trump Administration Says She Will Receive Due Process
Heinz Wattie's to Close Three New Zealand Plants, Cutting 350 Jobs
JPMorgan Closes Trump Accounts as $5 Billion Lawsuit Moves to New York
Moderna to Pay Up to $2.25B to Settle LNP Patent Dispute Over COVID-19 Vaccine Technology
Domino's Pizza UK Reports 15% Drop in Annual Profit Amid Weak Sales and Rising Costs
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Pentagon Taps Wall Street Talent to Manage $200 Billion Defense Investment Fund
CDC Acting Director Urges Measles Vaccination as U.S. Cases Surge in 2026
Shots Fired at U.S. Consulate in Toronto in Suspected National Security Incident
Lockheed Martin Invests $150M in Alabama Missile Production Facility
Amazon Invests $535 Million in Brisbane Robotics Fulfillment Center
Peter Mandelson Arrested in London Amid Jeffrey Epstein Ties Investigation 



