Kevin Hassett Says Inflation Is Below Target, Backs Trump’s Call for Rate Cuts 
Citi Appoints Ryan Ellis as Head of Markets Sales for Australia and New Zealand 
Google and Apple Warn U.S. Visa Holders to Avoid International Travel Amid Lengthy Embassy Delays 
U.S. Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Blacklist More Chinese Tech Firms Over Military Ties 
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
Precious Metals Rally as Silver and Platinum Outperform on Rate Cut Bets 
Dollar Holds Firm Ahead of Global Central Bank Decisions as Yen, Sterling and Euro React 
ANZ New CEO Forgoes Bonus After Shareholders Reject Executive Pay Report 
Delta Air Lines President Glen Hauenstein to Retire, Leaving Legacy of Premium Strategy 
Singapore Growth Outlook Brightens for 2025 as Economists Flag AI and Geopolitical Risks 
RBA Unlikely to Cut Interest Rates in 2026 as Inflation Pressures Persist, Says Westpac 
Japan Inflation Holds Firm in November as BOJ Nears Key Rate Hike Decision 
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation 
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland 
TikTok U.S. Deal Advances as ByteDance Signs Binding Joint Venture Agreement 
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand 
Chinese Robotaxi Stocks Rally as Tesla Boosts Autonomous Driving Optimism 
Walmart and Energizer Holdings Inc. were sued by both retailers and shoppers for suspicion of collusion. They have reportedly proposed three antitrust class action suits after accusing the companies of being in cahoots to raise the prices of disposable batteries.
According to Reuters, the complaints against Walmart and Energizer were filed on Friday, April 28. It was stated in the documents that the world’s largest battery maker agreed "under pressure from Walmart" to increase battery prices for wholesale transactions with other retailers.
This scheme allegedly started sometime in 2018, and Energizer also required the retailers not to sell batteries for prices lower than Walmart’s. If they charge less than the Arkansas-headquartered retailer chain firm, the rival retailers risked being cut off by Energizer or given higher wholesale prices.
In the complaint, it was further stated that the setup resulted in higher prices of batteries - from Energizer and Duracell - which are the dominant firms in the disposable battery industry with a combined total of 85% market share. The higher prices are said to be unexplainable amid inflation and changes in demand.
Retailers and consumers are also seeking injunctions to stop Energizer from binding battery sales to pricing. They want Energizer and Walmart to dissolve the effects of their anticompetitive practices and behaviors.
The complainants also said that the battery maker’s market share in the United States also rose to more than 50% from its 40% percentage in 2018. Moreover, they mentioned that a sales representative of Energizer confirmed they had made changes to their pricing after Walmart requested it.
"She admitted that Energizer had adjusted its pricing policies at Walmart's request, telling him, 'This is 1000% about Walmart and wanting the best price,'" they said in the filing.
Meanwhile, the antitrust cases against Energizer and Walmart that were filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, are Portable Power Inc v Energizer Holdings Inc et al, No. 23-02091; Copeland et al v Energizer Holdings Inc et al, No. 23-02087; and Schuman et al v Energizer Holdings Inc et al, No. 23-02093.
Photo by: Roberto Sorin/Unsplash
