California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday vetoed a closely-watched AI safety bill, expressing concerns that the bill’s broad scope could negatively affect innovation and AI development in the state. The bill, authored by State Senator Scott Wiener, aimed to regulate high-risk AI systems but faced strong opposition from major tech companies and some federal lawmakers.
Governor’s Concerns and Industry Opposition
Newsom criticized the bill for not considering the risk levels or the sensitivity of data involved in AI applications. He argued it would impose “stringent standards” on even the most basic AI functions deployed by large systems. To address the risks of AI while fostering innovation, Newsom called on leading experts to help develop "workable guardrails" informed by scientific analysis and directed state agencies to assess potential AI-related catastrophic risks. The Chamber of Progress, a tech industry coalition, supported Newsom's veto, stating that California's tech economy benefits from competition and openness.
Proponents Push for AI Regulation
Senator Wiener contended that the legislation was necessary to implement proactive safeguards before AI systems became too advanced to control. Following the veto, he expressed concern that California would be left less protected, as companies developing powerful AI face no binding safety restrictions. He criticized the reliance on voluntary commitments from AI developers, arguing these are rarely effective in protecting the public interest.
Legislation and Infrastructure Safeguards
The proposed bill focused on generative AI, which can produce content like text, photos, and videos in response to prompts. It mandated safety testing for advanced AI models costing over $100 million to develop or requiring significant computing power and would have created a state body to oversee "Frontier Models" exceeding current AI capabilities. Newsom’s veto reflects the challenges in balancing regulation with innovation, especially as federal AI oversight legislation stalls in Congress. However, he signed a separate measure requiring risk assessments of AI threats to California's critical infrastructure, including the energy and water sectors.
Tech Industry's Mixed Response
Major tech companies like Google, OpenAI, and Meta, who are developing generative AI models, opposed the bill, citing concerns over its potential to stifle innovation. Some federal lawmakers, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi, also opposed it. However, proponents included Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk, who runs the AI firm xAI, and Amazon-backed Anthropic, which supported the bill while noting concerns about certain provisions.


Russia Stocks End Flat as Energy Shares Support MOEX Index
Global Demand for Yuan Loans and Bonds Surges as China Pushes Currency Internationalization
Asian Stocks Rise as Wall Street Tech Rally Lifts Markets, Yen Slumps Despite BOJ Rate Hike
Precious Metals Rally as Silver and Platinum Outperform on Rate Cut Bets
Platinum Price Surges Past $2,000 as Demand and Supply Dynamics Tighten
Oil Prices Climb in Asian Trade as Venezuela Sanctions and Middle East Tensions Fuel Risk Premium
Kevin Hassett Says Inflation Is Below Target, Backs Trump’s Call for Rate Cuts
EU Delays Mercosur Free Trade Agreement Signing Amid Ukraine War Funding Talks
China’s Power Market Revamp Fuels Global Boom in Energy Storage Batteries
Global Markets Rise as Tech Stocks Lead, Yen Strengthens, and Commodities Hit Record Highs
Why U.S. Coffee Prices Are Staying High Despite Trump’s Tariff Rollbacks
IMF Reaches Staff-Level Agreement With Egypt, Opening Path to $3.8 Billion in Funding
U.S. Stock Futures Rise Ahead of Holiday-Shortened Week as AI Optimism Lifts Tech
UK Economy Grows 0.1% in Q3 2025 as Outlook Remains Fragile
China Keeps Benchmark Lending Rates Steady as Economic Outlook Remains Cautious
Gold Prices Surge to Record Highs as Geopolitical Tensions Fuel Safe-Haven Demand 



