Trump DOJ Challenges Colorado’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban in Second Amendment Lawsuit 
US, Japan Reaffirm Strong Currency Coordination Amid Yen Volatility 
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 
Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang Pleads Guilty in China Foreign Agent Case 
Native American Groups Slam Trump’s Call to Restore Redskins Name 
Trump Signs Executive Order Targeting Big-Money College Athlete Payouts 
Australia Housing Tax Reform Sparks Debate Over Property Investor Tax Breaks 
Supreme Court Asked to Reinstate Mail-Order Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone 
Dollar Surges as Inflation Data Fuels Fed Rate Hike Expectations 
Asia-Pacific Banks Brace for Rising Credit Risks Amid Iran Conflict 
What makes a good football coach? The reality behind the myths 
Nvidia’s China AI Chip Sales Remain Frozen Despite U.S. Approval 
Trump Threatens Stadium Deal Over Washington Commanders Name 
Aung San Suu Kyi Moved to House Arrest Amid Myanmar Political Crisis 
NBA Returns to China with Alibaba Partnership and Historic Macau Games 
OpenAI Finds No Evidence of User Data Breach in TanStack npm Supply-Chain Attack 
ASX Names Former Euronext Executive Anthony Attia as New CEO 
The Delhi High Court has ordered the blocking of a website accused of selling ‘first copy’ of popular footwear brands like Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Louis Vuitton at highly discounted prices.
In an order, Justice Navin Chawla also sought details and KYC documents of three mobile numbers through which the website ‘www.myshoeshop.in’ was allegedly offering the goods.
The court also ordered the suspension of the Instagram page of the website and asked for details of its owner.
The order was passed on a commercial suit filed by US-based manufacturer, New Balance Athletics Inc, who accused ‘Ashok Kumar Trading’ of selling counterfeits of its footwear and also that of other well-known brands.
The court said that New Balance has made out a prima facie case for grant of an injunction and the balance of convenience also lies in its favor.
It added that an irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff and consumers if the defendant is not restrained from continuing with their web portal.
The court had ordered the defendant to file a written statement within 30 days. The case is set for hearing on November 9.
