International Outcry Grows Over Re-Arrest of Nobel Laureate Narges Mohammadi in Iran 
SpaceX Begins IPO Preparations as Wall Street Banks Line Up for Advisory Roles 
Federal Judge Orders Restoration of SEVIS Status for Tufts PhD Student Rumeysa Ozturk 
FDA Says No Black Box Warning Planned for COVID-19 Vaccines Despite Safety Debate 
Special Prosecutor Alleges Yoon Suk Yeol Sought North Korea Provocation to Justify Martial Law 
New Epstein Photos Surface Showing Trump as Lawmakers Near Document Release Deadline 
Brazil Arrests Former Peruvian Foreign Minister Augusto Blacker Miller in International Fraud Case 
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project 
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations 
Bank of Korea Downplays Liquidity’s Role in Weak Won and Housing Price Surge 
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Plunge on Earnings Warning Amid U.S. and China Weakness 
Korea Zinc Plans $6.78 Billion U.S. Smelter Investment With Government Partnership 
DOJ Sues Loudoun County School Board Over Transgender Locker Room Policy 
Environmental Group Sues to Block Trump Image on U.S. National Park Passes 
New Zealand Budget Outlook Shows Prolonged Deficits Despite Economic Recovery Hopes 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
noyb Files GDPR Complaints Against TikTok, Grindr, and AppsFlyer Over Alleged Illegal Data Tracking. 
Nike and Converse have settled a custom-sneaker lawsuit against its former employee Jeffrey Waskowiak and his company KickRich LLC over a case involving trademark infringement, dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
The brands sued Waskowiak and KickRich on July 19, 2021, in the District of Oregon due to their alleged practice of reselling materially altered Nike and Converse products that they have never approved or authorized.”
According to Nike and Converse, the defendants acquired genuine Nike and Converse footwear and then altered the uppers to create custom footwear products that still display their brand logos.
The plaintiffs alleged that the unauthorized customizations limit their abilities to control their brands, business reputations, and associated goodwill.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the altered footwear falsely affiliated them with other brands, such as Amazon by mashing up an authentic Nike Air Jordan 1 shoe, adding Amazon Prime branding in multiple locations, including next to the signature Nike Swoosh design.
The plaintiffs also claimed that the defendants “make and sell laser cut and digital download ‘shoe patterns' that let others fake several of Nike's iconic and trade-dress protected footwear styles, including the Air Force 1, the Dunk, and the Air Jordan 1”.
Lastly, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have created confusion in the marketplace by including the plaintiffs' vintage logos and slogans, as well as references to Waskowiak's prior employment as a Nike footwear developer, which suggests authorization. The plaintiffs not only sought monetary damages but also injunctive relief.
In December, the parties filed a proposed judgment that emphasized Nike and Converse as the “exclusive owners” of several trademarks and trade dress.
The proposal also included a permanent injunction against KickRich for infringing and diluting the trademarks and for using false designations of origin through its practice of promoting, offering for sale, and selling the products.
Interestingly, KickRich may offer and promote customization services of genuine Nike and Converse products, according to the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.
As the settlement agreement is confidential, it is unknown what KickRich is permitted to do when providing said customization services.
