This week marks the start of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings at the US Senate for President Joe Biden’s nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. Jackson appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where the lawmakers weighed her nomination.
Jackson appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday to defend her career as lawmakers from both sides weighed her nomination to the high court. If confirmed, Jackson will be succeeding Justice Stephen Breyer, who will be retiring this year and become the first Black woman to sit at the Supreme Court bench.
“I have been a judge for nearly a decade now, and I take that responsibility and my duty to be independent very seriously,” said Jackson during her testimony. “I decide cases from a neutral posture. I evaluate the facts and I interpret and apply the law to the facts of the case before me, without fear or favor, consistent with my judicial oath.”
Monday’s hearing marks the first of four days of hearings at the Senate, after hours of opening statements from each member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Lawmakers will begin to question Jackson in the next three days.
Democrats in the committee lauded Jackson’s career, while Republicans predictably raised concerns on some of Jackson’s past rulings and judicial philosophy. Jackson’s hearings also come as the Democratic-controlled Senate can confirm her even without support from Republicans.
“This is a momentous occasion and you have much to be proud of,” said Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, who chairs the committee. Durbin also pushed back on the criticism coming from Republicans who claim that Jackson is “soft on crime” and those who say that Jackson will serve as a “rubber stamp” for the Biden administration. Durbin said such claims were “baseless.”
Among the Republican lawmakers that have tried to levy such criticism towards Jackson is Missouri senator Josh Hawley, who accused Jackson of arguing that certain child pornography offenders are not as serious. However, according to columnist Steve Benen in a piece for MSNBC, Hawley’s attempt to smear Jackson ended up backfiring.
Benen explained that once Hawley tried to make such accusations towards Jackson, many fact-checkers immediately dismantled his claims.
Benen cited the conclusions of fact-checkers from the Associated Press, CNN, and the Washington Post, who all came to the same conclusion that Hawley’s accusations “don’t stand up to scrutiny.”
Ian Millheiser of Vox also called Hawley’s claims “genuinely nauseating,” while Andrew McCarthy of the conservative National Review said that the Missouri Republican’s attempt to smear Jackson with the accusations “appears meritless to the point of demagoguery.”


U.S.-Iran Peace Talks Gain Momentum Amid Ongoing Conflict
Denmark Election 2025: Social Democrats Suffer Historic Losses Amid Migration and Cost-of-Living Tensions
Trump Administration Opens Two New Investigations Into Harvard Over Discrimination and Antisemitism
Kristi Noem Ends Western Hemisphere Tour in Diminished Role After DHS Firing
Taiwan Arms Deal on Track Despite U.S.-China Summit Uncertainty
Russia-Iran Military Alliance Deepens With Drone Shipments Amid Middle East Tensions
US Accelerates Taiwan Arms Deliveries Amid Rising China Threat
Maduro Faces Rare Narcoterrorism Charges in U.S. Court
Israel Eyes Litani River as New Border Amid Escalating Lebanon Offensive
Pakistan's Diplomatic Rise: Mediating U.S.-Iran Peace Talks
Trump Administration Settles Lawsuit Barring Federal Agencies from Pressuring Social Media Censorship
Jay Bhattacharya to Continue Leading CDC as White House Searches for Permanent Director
Iran-U.S. Negotiations: Tehran Reviews American Peace Proposal Amid Ongoing Gulf Conflict
Iran Demands Lebanon Be Part of Any Ceasefire Deal With Israel and the U.S.
Russia Strikes Kharkiv and Izmail as Cross-Border Drone War Escalates
G7 Foreign Ministers Gather in France Amid Global Tensions and U.S. Policy Uncertainty
Trump Says Iran Offered Major Energy Concession Amid Ongoing Negotiations 



