The legislation targeting illegal migrant crossings was approved by the British lower house of Parliament this week. The passage of the legislation follows several amendments accepted by the government by several conservatives.
The new law, which would bar the entry of migrants in small boats and prevent them from claiming asylum and facing detention or deportation, was passed by the lower house of Parliament on Wednesday following several amendments made to the legislation by several Conservatives. The passage of the law also comes as British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made stopping illegal migration one of his top priorities.
The House of Commons passed the third reading of the bill by 289-230. The legislation will now be passed to the House of Lords, where it may be amended or delayed.
“Illegal migration undermines the integrity of our immigration system,” said British immigration minister Robert Jenrick ahead of the vote. “That’s why we want to stop the boats and secure our borders and this bill is dedicated to that goal.”
The government faced several amendments to the bill that would appease several lawmakers. The amendments included clarifying the limited circumstances where unaccompanied minors could be deported and a commitment to establish “safe and legal routes” for asylum seekers to reach the United Kingdom.
However, other amendments tightened the legislation, which would make it harder for those who are deported to seek a waiver of their ban on re-entry or gaining British citizenship, as well as limiting the ability of individuals to delay their removal to a third country citing the risk of “serious and irreversible harm.”
Two other amendments proposed by Conservative lawmakers were withdrawn after the government said it would look to do more on handling the issues raised through such amendments. One of which was to remove the power to deport children before they turn 18 and one to exempt victims of unlawful exploitation in the UK from removal.
The legislation is currently being challenged in the courts. Lawyers representing a group of asylum seekers have said that the deal the UK has with Rwanda is not lawful due to the East African nation not being a safe country. One of the lawyers told the UK appeals court that Rwanda is an authoritarian, one-party country that did not tolerate opposition and attacked political opponents.


Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Russia Warns Foreign Troop Deployment in Ukraine Would Be Treated as Legitimate Military Targets
Trump Calls for “Nationalizing” Voting, Drawing Backlash Over Election Authority
Israel Reopens Rafah Crossing, Offering Limited Relief to Gaza Patients Amid Ceasefire Efforts
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile
Netanyahu Warns U.S. Envoy Iran Unlikely to Honor Nuclear Deal as Talks Resume
UK and US Reaffirm Strategic Importance of Diego Garcia Base Amid Chagos Sovereignty Dispute
U.S.-Iran Nuclear Talks Expected in Oman Following Venue Change Request
U.S. Condemns South Africa’s Expulsion of Israeli Diplomat Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions
Russia Prepares for Post–New START Era as U.S.-Russia Nuclear Arms Control Nears Collapse
Trump Plans Call With Savannah Guthrie After Mother’s Disappearance, Federal Support Considered
Venezuela and U.S. Move Toward Renewed Diplomatic Relations
Trump Says U.S.–Iran Talks Continue as Military Tensions Remain High
Taiwan Urges Stronger Trade Ties With Fellow Democracies, Rejects Economic Dependence on China
Japan Finance Minister Defends PM Takaichi’s Remarks on Weak Yen Benefits
Stephen Miran Resigns as White House Economic Adviser Amid Federal Reserve Tenure
Medvedev Warns World Is Growing More Dangerous but Says Russia Seeks to Avoid Global Conflict 



