GM Issues Recall for 2026 Chevrolet Silverado Trucks Over Missing Owner Manuals 
Netflix Nearing Major Deal to Acquire Warner Bros Discovery Assets 
IKEA Launches First New Zealand Store, Marking Expansion Into Its 64th Global Market 
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off 
Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities 
Amazon Italy Pays €180M in Compensation as Delivery Staff Probe Ends 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
Momenta Quietly Moves Toward Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising China-U.S. Tensions 
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 
Visa to Move European Headquarters to London’s Canary Wharf 
Airbus Faces Pressure After November Deliveries Dip Amid Industrial Setback 
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies 
Airline Loyalty Programs Face New Uncertainty as Visa–Mastercard Fee Settlement Evolves 
Tesla Expands Affordable Model 3 Lineup in Europe to Boost EV Demand 
Starbucks has been cited for violating some union laws; thus, the federal regulators are reportedly seeking to reopen at least 23 stores that they said were shut down illegally. The U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) said the operations in these outlets were halted due to union organizing.
The independent federal agency that protects the rights of private sector employees said that such a move is a violation of federal labor law. The regulator described this act as union-busting; thus, it would like for the shuttered Starbucks locations to reopen.
NLRB’s New Complaint vs. Starbucks
Kiro7 News reported that the feds accused Starbucks of closing almost two dozen coffee houses to deter employees from unionizing or engaging in union-organizing activities. The complaint against the company was raised by a regional office of the NLRB this week.
The feds argued that Starbucks closed down 23 stores either because the staff members have already unionized or the HQ is taking measures to stop them from doing so. It was shared in the complaint that workers in at least seven stores had unionized.
At any rate, the union that represents the employees of Starbucks is called the Starbucks Workers United. It is based in New York and is affiliated with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), which represents the baristas at 340 Starbucks stores in the U.S.
Case is Set to Go to the Administrative Judge
The complaint is the latest addition to the series of accusations made by the feds against Starbucks for allegedly breaking the law during its 2-year labor campaign, as per The New York Times. This case is set to be forwarded to the administrative judge next summer, but this may not reach trial if Starbucks decides to settle the matter early.
“This complaint is the latest confirmation of Starbucks’ determination to illegally oppose workers’ organizing,” an employee at Starbucks, Mari Cosgrove, said via Workers United’s spokesperson.
