9 Tips for Avoiding Tax Season Cyber Scams 
NAB Plans to Cut 170 Jobs While Expanding Offshore Operations 
Valero Port Arthur Refinery Explosion Prompts $1M Lawsuit Over Worker Safety Negligence 
Berkshire Hathaway and Tokio Marine Form Major Strategic Insurance Partnership 
Citi Names Eric Farina and Rob Cascarino to Lead Global Infrastructure Financing Group 
OpenAI Pulls the Plug on Sora, Ending $1 Billion Disney Partnership 
CK Hutchison's Panama Ports Dispute Escalates as Arbitration Claims Surpass $2 Billion 
Meta Ties Executive Pay to Aggressive Stock Price Targets in Major Retention Push 
Lynas Rare Earths Signs Vietnam Deal with LS Eco Energy to Boost Magnet Metal Production 
Delivery Hero Sells Taiwan Foodpanda to Grab for $600 Million in Debt-Reduction Push 
Golden Dome Missile Defense: Anduril and Palantir Join Forces on Trump's $185B Space Shield 
SpaceX IPO Filing Expected This Week as Valuation Could Surpass $75 Billion 
Air Canada Express Crash at LaGuardia: Controller Distracted by Prior Emergency 
Finnair Orders 18 Embraer E195-E2 Jets in Landmark Fleet Overhaul 
Sonova Shares Slip as Hearing Aid Giant Lowers Growth Outlook and Plans Sennheiser Exit 
Goldman Sachs Raises ECB Rate Hike Forecast Amid Persistent Energy-Driven Inflation 
SK Innovation scored a point when the U.S. International Trade Commission released its preliminary decision this week. The USITC sided with SK in the battery patent lawsuit filed by LG Energy Solutions when it said that no violation was committed.
As per The Korea Times, the U.S. trade watchdog ruled in favor of SK Innovation, and this ruling was announced on Wednesday, March 31. After clearing SKI in the battery infringement suit, it was reported that the company’s shares immediately surged by 15%.
Why USITC cleared SK
The trade commission said in its preliminary ruling that it could not find evidence that proves SK Innovation infringed any of LG Energy’s battery patents. The decision was handed down as the deadline to decide whether the White House could veto a separate ITC ruling based on February’s finding that stated SKI unlawfully obtained LG’s trade secrets.
"It is my initial determination in this investigation that there is no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, in the importation into the U.S., the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the U.S. after importation of certain lithium battery cells, battery modules, battery packs, components thereof and products containing the same, with respect to the alleged infringement of asserted claims (of the four patents)," Judge Dee Lord stated.
But then again, it should be noted that this is just a preliminary resolution. The final ruling on LGES’ patent lawsuit against SK Innovation is due on Aug. 2.
SKI’s response to USITC decision
SKI applauded the commission’s ruling and said again that the company’s battery technologies are original. It also reiterated that the products were the results of hard work.
"We have been developing advanced battery technology over an extended period of time, and therefore anticipated that the ITC would rule that no infringements were made on LGES' patents,” SK stated. “The preliminary ruling shows SKI's technological capabilities."
This ruling is a separate case from the trade secret issue between LGES and SK Innovation. ITC sided with the former in this case, and it is facing a 10-year import ban in the U.S. SKI is currently making an appeal to reverse the resolution. This ban will take effect if President Joe Biden does not overrule the decision, and he has until April 11 to decide.
Meanwhile, Reuters noted that SK Innovation and LG Energy could dissolve the USITC ruling in this trade secret suit if they can agree to a settlement. The officials in Georgia also previously called on the companies to negotiate and end the dispute to avoid further troubles as it is not just SK and LG that will be affected if the decision is not revoked.
