Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Boeing Signals Progress on Delayed 777X Program With Planned April First Flight 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Novo Nordisk Warns of Profit Decline as Wegovy Faces U.S. Price Pressure and Rising Competition 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
IRVINE, Calif., Sept. 18, 2017 -- Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against Lexmark International Inc. (“Lexmark” or the “Company”) (NYSE: LXK). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lexmark shares from August 1, 2014 through July 20, 2015, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm by September 19, 2017, the lead plaintiff motion deadline.
If you purchased Lexmark shares during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 4000 Barranca Parkway, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92604, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at [email protected].
There has been no class certification in this case yet. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may choose to take no action and remain a passive class member as well.
The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, Lexmark made materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failed to disclose, that: end-user demand and growth for the Company’s supplies business was deteriorating; that pricing increases were the primary driver of supplies revenue growth, not end-user demand; that customers in the supplies channel reacted by buying ahead of anticipated pricing increases; and that as a result, there were excessive inventory levels at its European wholesale distributors. On July 21, 2015, the Company reported poor results for its second quarter ending June 30, 2015 and lowered its 2015 sales guidance. The Company revealed its supplies growth was not attributable to end-user demand but rather the result of its European customers buying ahead of customary price increases which produced excessive inventory. Following this news, Lexmark’s stock price fell materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.
If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esquire, a prominent litigator for almost two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or via e-mail at [email protected].
This press release may constitute Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.
Contact
Joon M. Khang, Esq.
Telephone: 949-419-3834
Facsimile: 949-225-4474
[email protected]
