Oil Prices Slide on US-Iran Talks, Dollar Strength and Profit-Taking Pressure 
Russian Stocks End Mixed as MOEX Index Closes Flat Amid Commodity Strength 
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations 
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer 
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project 
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors 
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding 
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House 
Japanese Pharmaceutical Stocks Slide as TrumpRx.gov Launch Sparks Market Concerns 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
