Apple CEO John Ternus Plans Major Overhaul 
Nvidia China Chip Sales Report Sends Chinese Semiconductor Stocks Lower 
Bitget Resumes Crypto Withdrawals After $388M Security Breach 
ICE Agent Arrested in Minneapolis Over Venezuelan Man Shooting 
TikTok Reaches $100 Million Alabama Settlement Over Child Safety Claims 
Japan Warns Markets Over Yen Weakness 
Hengrui Shares Rise on $2.6 Billion Novo Nordisk Obesity Drug Deal 
BlackRock Sees AI Agents Fueling New Crypto Demand 
Goldman Sachs Private Credit Fund Sees Redemptions Ease in Q3 
Google Pays Publishers for AI Search Content in New Pilot 
China Cuts Tariffs on U.S. Farm Goods but Excludes Soybeans 
Samsung Invests $1 Billion in KKR’s Helix AI Infrastructure 
Rodrigo Duterte Makes First Public Appearance at ICC in 18 Months 
Evan Gershkovich Says FSB Set Trap for 2023 Russia Arrest 
TD Cowen Starts SpaceX at Buy, Sees AI Compute Driving Growth 
Asian Chip Stocks Tumble as OpenAI Safety Pause Sparks AI Growth Concerns 
US Court Approves airBaltic Chapter 11 Restructuring 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
