Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX 
BOJ Governor Ueda Highlights Uncertainty Over Future Interest Rate Hikes 
Asian Markets Mixed as RBI Cuts Rates and BOJ Signals Possible Hike 
Spain’s Industrial Output Records Steady Growth in October Amid Revised September Figures 
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
Bolsonaro Blames Medication Mix-Up for Ankle Monitor Tampering as Detention Continues 
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
Intel Rejects TSMC’s Allegations of Trade-Secret Leaks as Legal Battle Escalates 
Afghan Suspect in Deadly Shooting of National Guard Members Faces First-Degree Murder Charge 
ExxonMobil to Shut Older Singapore Steam Cracker Amid Global Petrochemical Downturn 
Lockheed Martin Secures $1.14 Billion Contract Boost for F-35 Production 
Yellow Corp Reaches Major Settlement With Pension Plans Amid Ongoing Bankruptcy Case 
Amazon Italy Pays €180M in Compensation as Delivery Staff Probe Ends 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
Boeing Acquisition of Spirit AeroSystems Could Close Soon Amid Ongoing Conditions 
Union Urges Court to Compel Trump Administration to Restore CFPB Funding 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office dismissed accusations that the app LawTalk and its operator Law & Company Co. violated the Attorney-at-law Act and the Privacy Act as it is provided for free.
The app does not receive any commissions from member attorneys and only earns from advertisements.
The Attorney-at-law Act bans acts of introducing or recommending a designated lawyer.
The allegations that the AI-based penalty estimation service was run despite the fact that it was not an attorney were dismissed because the service is provided for free.
The prosecutor's office also disputed the notion that LawTalk's motto, which claims to evaluate a case in 15 minutes by an attorney, gives the misleading impression that the company provides legal services.
The prosecutor's office also dismissed another charge that LawTalk violated the Privacy Act by illegally collecting court cases containing personal information because LawTalk obtained them through the country's official court website, leaving no proof of illegal tampering with its systems.
After a bar organization sued Law & Company at the prosecutor's office in November 2020, the matter went viral.
