Bolsonaro Blames Medication Mix-Up for Ankle Monitor Tampering as Detention Continues 
IKEA Launches First New Zealand Store, Marking Expansion Into Its 64th Global Market 
Key Witness Seeks to Block Evidence in Potential Revival of Comey Case 
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies 
Judge Dismisses Charges Against Comey and Letitia James After Ruling on Prosecutor’s Appointment 
GM Issues Recall for 2026 Chevrolet Silverado Trucks Over Missing Owner Manuals 
Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
Afghan Suspect in Deadly Shooting of National Guard Members Faces First-Degree Murder Charge 
Appeals Court Blocks Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations in the U.S. 
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
Amazon Italy Pays €180M in Compensation as Delivery Staff Probe Ends 
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed 
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban 
Airbus Faces Pressure After November Deliveries Dip Amid Industrial Setback 
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
U.S. oil refiner Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX) has been ordered by a California state court to pay $800 million to biofuel producer Propel Fuels for misappropriating trade secrets to strengthen its renewable fuel operations.
The Alameda County court ruling includes $604.9 million in compensatory damages and $195 million in punitive damages. The court described Phillips 66’s actions as “reprehensible,” citing abuse of bargaining power during due diligence.
A jury previously found that Phillips 66 had obtained confidential financial and strategic data from Propel Fuels under the pretense of exploring an acquisition in 2017. The refiner later abandoned the deal in 2018 and launched its own renewable fuel products in 2019, allegedly using Propel’s proprietary information.
Sacramento-based Propel Fuels, known for low-emission gasoline and diesel, filed the lawsuit in 2022. Propel’s legal team from Kobre & Kim emphasized the verdict’s significance, stating it serves as a broader message to protect innovators in the clean energy sector.
Phillips 66, headquartered in Houston, has acknowledged receipt of the order and said it is evaluating legal options, suggesting a potential appeal.
The case underscores rising tensions in the renewable energy and biofuels industry, where traditional oil companies are increasingly seeking to transition toward sustainable fuel solutions. The verdict may also signal heightened legal scrutiny over trade secret misappropriation in clean energy partnerships.
The landmark judgment comes as renewable fuels gain momentum amid tightening U.S. and California emissions regulations and growing investor interest in sustainable energy.
