Interim housing isn't just a roof and four walls. Good design is key to getting people out of homelessness
US federal court rejects Pfizer's appeal over co-pays for heart failure patients
Pfizer Inc's challenge to a US anti-kickback law which it says prevented it from helping heart failure patients afford the medicine that cost $225,000 per year was rejected by a federal appeals court.
A three-judge panel of the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected Pfizer's effort to directly cover co-pays for patients taking its Vyndaqel and Vyndamax drugs.
Even in the absence of corrupt intent, the court agreed with a lower court judge that Pfizer's Direct Copay Assistance Program broke the law by "knowingly or willingly" offering financial support to encourage the purchase of federally reimbursable drugs.
The government maintained that if Pfizer won, Medicare would be responsible for paying "astronomical" prescription costs. Pfizer, however, argued that criminalizing its planned behavior would unfairly deny some low-income people access to the medications they require.
A similar interpretation may make it unlawful to use crowd-funding to pay for medical expenses or make it unlawful for kind family members to pay for their loved one's medical care, according to Pfizer, which termed the decision unsatisfactory.
Vyndaqel and Vyndamax, also known as tafamidis, are used to treat transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy ("ATTR-CM"), a disorder that causes the heart to harden, obstructs blood flow, and can result in progressive heart failure.
Will AI kill our creativity? It could – if we don’t start to value and protect the traits that make us human