Mastercard is making an appeal, and the court in London is setting up a trial to reconsider the earlier ruling where the financial services company was ordered to pay £14 billion or $19 billion to customers in a class-action suit.
As per Reuters, the court will decide if Mastercard should proceed with paying customers in the U.K. who are entitled to £300 each if the prosecutors will uphold the order against the American company.
The lawsuit against Mastercard
The case that the company is facing right now is considered the largest of its kind due to the amount involved. After losing in the legal battle, Mastercard was ordered by the U.K.’s highest court to compensate its customers in the country.
The issue here that led to the lawsuit is related to the swipe fees in Mastercard credit cards. The Supreme Court sided with the group that is representing more or less 46 million clients of the company. In this class action, the judge said that each one of these customers should get £300, which has been described as “mass claims.”
In this new development regarding the case, a two-day court hearing has been set for March 25 and 26. This will determine the final judgment in the U.K.’s first mass consumer claim. The decision is also expected to stir up similar class-action suits as there are other companies that may have committed the same mistake.
The outset of the lawsuit
The lawsuit against Mastercard was raised by Walter Merricks, a former financial ombudsman, who claimed that the company overcharged millions of people in Britain in the span of 16 years. He has been hoping that the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) will verify this case after the Supreme Court repeals objections for it to proceed in December.
Meanwhile, Lawyer Monthly reported that Merricks pointed out that Mastercard charged exorbitant interchange fees between May 1992 to June 2008. These fees are what the retailers' customers pay to credit card companies when customers use their Mastercard card when shopping.
“Mastercard has been a sustained competition lawbreaker, imposing excessive card transaction charges over a prolonged period in a way it must have known would impose an invisible tax on UK consumers,” Merricks said in December 2020.


Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 



