US companies that will cover travel costs for employees getting abortions could be exposed to criminal liability, according to legal experts.
Last Friday, the US Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion and upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks.
Amazon.com Inc, Apple Inc, Lyft Inc, Microsoft Corp, and JPMorgan Chase & Co were among companies that announced plans to provide those benefits through their health insurance plans.
Conde Nast, Walt Disney Co, Cigna Corp, Paypal Holdings Inc, Alaska Airlines Inc, and Dick's Sporting Goods Inc announced reimbursement policies.
If businesses adopt policies that support employees getting abortions, they will have to navigate the patchwork of state laws and risk angering anti-abortion organizations and Republican-led states.
Texas state legislators have already threatened legal action against Lyft and Citigroup Inc, both of which had previously announced travel reimbursement policies.
The lawmakers also presented a number of abortion-related bills, one of which would prevent businesses from operating in Texas if they pay for women living there to have abortions elsewhere.
Companies will probably soon be sued by states or anti-abortion activists who claim that payments related to abortions violate state laws prohibiting the facilitation or aiding and abetting of abortions, says University of Illinois law professor and expert on healthcare law, Robin Fretwell Wilson.
States are not allowed to enact regulations prohibiting to employer-sponsored health plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). That language has been interpreted by courts for decades to preclude state regulations that specify what health plans must and must not cover.
Any company sued over an abortion travel reimbursement requirement will likely cite ERISA as a defense, according to Katy Johnson, senior counsel for health policy at the American Benefits Council, a trade group.
However, fully-insured health plans, in which employers purchase coverage through a commercial insurer, are regulated by state law and not ERISA.
Furthermore, ERISA does not preclude states from enforcing criminal laws, such as the laws in a number of states that make it illegal to aid and abet abortions.


Trump Election Order Blocked Again as Appeals Court Rejects Mail-In Voting Push in 23 States
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief
Singapore Raises 2026 GDP Growth Forecast to 4.5%-5.5% as AI Boom Fuels Economy
Mercedes-Benz Stock Offers Deep-Value Potential as Citi Sees Recovery Catalysts
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Bid to Reinstate $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
Trump Media Says Truth API Draws 10+ Customers as Conflict Concerns Grow
Maduro, U.S. Prosecutors Propose June 2027 Trial Date in Drug Trafficking Case
Juan Orlando Hernandez Seeks Dismissal of Honduras Charges After Trump Pardon
Oil Prices Rise as US-Iran Talks Stall, Inflation Risks Grow
Trump Administration Bars U.S. Travelers From Congo Flights Amid Ebola Outbreak
Asian Stocks Mixed as RBA Holds Rates, Oil Risks Rise
US Yen Intervention Unlikely to Deliver Lasting Recovery, Yardeni Says
Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico
China Inflation Cools in July as CPI Misses Forecast, PPI Deflation Eases
Civil Rights Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Childcare Funding Freeze and Influencer's Role
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Jump as U.S. Overhaul Lifts FY2026 Outlook
Singapore Raises 2026 GDP Growth Forecast as AI Demand Fuels Economy 



