Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis 
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages 
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 
Japan Economy Poised for Q4 2025 Growth as Investment and Consumption Hold Firm 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal 
Asian Stocks Slip as Tech Rout Deepens, Japan Steadies Ahead of Election 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Japanese Pharmaceutical Stocks Slide as TrumpRx.gov Launch Sparks Market Concerns 
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that 
An Australian court has ruled that pop superstar Katy Perry infringed the trademark of a Sydney-based fashion designer, Katie Taylor, who has been selling her products locally under the "Katie Perry" label
Katie Taylor, whose birth name is Katie Perry, alleged in her 2019 lawsuit that the singer ignored the trademark and sold Katy Perry clothing to Australian customers in 2014 and 2018 during her concert tours in the country through retailers and websites.
According to Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic's ruling, Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media.
Damages are due to decided at a later date.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark.
Taylor called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
