Morgan Stanley Raises Tesla Q2 Delivery Forecast on Strong Europe and China Demand 
RBA Minutes Signal Australia Central Bank Remains Ready to Raise Interest Rates if Inflation Persists 
AI is driving down the price of knowledge – universities have to rethink what they offer 
Wall Street Futures Rise Ahead of JOLTS Data, Nike Earnings, and U.S.-Iran Talks 
Why financial hardship is more likely if you’re disabled or sick 
Disaster or digital spectacle? The dangers of using floods to create social media content 
Why a ‘rip-off’ degree might be worth the money after all – research study 
US Egg Producers Settle Price Manipulation Probe, Agree to Pay $3.3 Million and Donate 53 Million Eggs 
Office design isn’t keeping up with post-COVID work styles - here’s what workers really want 
Google promotes ‘teacher approved’ apps for kids. Here’s what parents should know 
Every generation thinks they had it the toughest, but for Gen Z, they’re probably right 
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case 
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms 
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings 
SK Holdings, KKR Launch $1.3B Renewable Energy Venture in South Korea 
An Australian court has ruled that pop superstar Katy Perry infringed the trademark of a Sydney-based fashion designer, Katie Taylor, who has been selling her products locally under the "Katie Perry" label
Katie Taylor, whose birth name is Katie Perry, alleged in her 2019 lawsuit that the singer ignored the trademark and sold Katy Perry clothing to Australian customers in 2014 and 2018 during her concert tours in the country through retailers and websites.
According to Federal court judge Brigitte Markovic's ruling, Katy Perry's company Kitty Purry partially infringed the trademark of Katie Taylor's business, which sells mostly clothes online, by promoting the singer's products through posts on social media.
Damages are due to decided at a later date.
The judge dismissed a bid by the popstar seeking to cancel the Katie Perry trademark.
Taylor called the verdict a "David and Goliath" win for small businesses.
The tussle between the popstar and the Australian fashion designer over the homophonous name began in 2008 when Taylor registered the "Katie Perry" brand in Australia.
Katy Perry initially tried to block the registration and later engaged lawyers to try to force the designer to cease and forever desist from using the mark but later abandoned the move, Taylor said.
