Malaysia Airlines Ordered to Compensate Families of MH370 Passengers 
Trump Administration Fuel-Efficiency Rollback Could Raise Long-Term Costs for U.S. Drivers 
U.S. Special Forces Intercept Ship Carrying Military Components Bound for Iran 
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations 
Taiwan Opposition Criticizes Plan to Block Chinese App Rednote Over Security Concerns 
Korea Zinc Plans $6.78 Billion U.S. Smelter Investment With Government Partnership 
Trump Set to Begin Final Interviews for Next Federal Reserve Chair 
CFPB to Review Anti-Discrimination Policies and Fair Lending Rules Amid Policy Shift 
Colombia’s Clan del Golfo Peace Talks Signal Mandatory Prison Sentences for Top Leaders 
Syria Arrests Five Suspects After Deadly Attack on U.S. and Syrian Troops in Palmyra 
Belarus Pledges to Halt Smuggling Balloons Into Lithuania 
U.S. State Department Reverts to Times New Roman in Push for “Professionalism” 
U.S. Military Bill Seeks to End Dependence on China for Display Technology by 2030 
Thailand Vows Continued Military Action Amid Cambodia Border Clash Despite Trump Ceasefire Claim 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Strengthen U.S. Food Supply Chain Security 
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant 
Trump Criticizes EU’s €120 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X Platform 
A federal judge in Washington ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump unlawfully removed eight inspectors general by failing to notify Congress, but declined to reinstate them. U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes concluded that Trump violated the Inspector General Act (IGA), a law passed after the Watergate scandal to protect independent government watchdogs. The law requires presidents to provide Congress with 30 days’ notice and justification before removing inspectors general.
Judge Reyes emphasized that the inspectors general presented “compelling arguments” for reinstatement and praised their decades of service across multiple administrations. These officials, who oversaw agencies such as the Departments of Defense, State, Education, Agriculture, and Health and Human Services, were recognized for their role in safeguarding taxpayer dollars against waste, fraud, and abuse. “They deserved better from their government. They still do,” Reyes wrote in her 20-page opinion.
Despite acknowledging the unlawful dismissals, Reyes explained that the plaintiffs did not meet the legal threshold of “irreparable harm” required for reinstatement. She noted that even if the inspectors general were reinstated, Trump could immediately re-remove them by providing the required 30-day notice and rationale.
The case stems from Trump’s dismissal of at least 17 inspectors general during his second term. Eight of them filed suit earlier this year, claiming their removals were illegal and seeking reinstatement along with back pay.
In her ruling, Reyes linked the controversy to the historical backdrop of the 1972 Watergate burglary, which spurred Congress to pass the IGA in 1978. The law aimed to ensure government accountability through independent oversight.
The case has been paused while the Supreme Court reviews a related matter concerning Trump’s removal of a Federal Trade Commission official, which could influence the inspectors general’s claims.
At its core, the ruling underscores ongoing tensions between presidential authority and the independence of federal watchdogs. While the court affirmed the unlawful nature of Trump’s actions, the inspectors general’s fight for reinstatement remains unresolved.
