Exxon Mobil Corp has brought Macquarie Energy to court due to missed deliveries in the midst of a cold winter snap in the U.S. last month. The gas and oil company filed for an $11.7 billion lawsuit in the tribunal in Texas.
The billion-dollar lawsuit
As per Reuters, the issue between Exxon Mobil and Macquarie Energy began during the massive storm in February. Based on the filing, the former is suing the latter because the state declarations of emergencies and the storm prevented it from delivering its supply commitment to Macquarie, which is the U.S.'s second-largest gas marketer.
Exxon Mobil wants the court to rule that the heavy storm that swept over the central U.S. was a natural disaster. This is because Macquarie Energy has been demanding for Exxon to pay $11.7 million in damages for not being able to deliver the goods.
If the Texas court really declares that the storm was a natural disaster, his ruling will allow Exxon Mobil to break off its contract without the need to pay the penalty for the non-fulfillment of order delivery to Macquarie.
Based on the lawsuit documents, Exxon Mobil made its own declaration that the storm was a natural disaster, but Macquarie did not agree and immediately rejected this pronouncement. Despite its rejection, the Australian company that is headquartered in Texas, U.S.A., issued its own declaration later and called the incident force majeure too.
“We are confident we complied with all our obligations under terms of the contract,” Fox Business quoted Exxon spokesperson Casey Norton as saying with regards to the legal filing.
Exxon facing another lawsuit
Meanwhile, aside from this new legal battle, Exxon Mobil is also involved in another case. This time, the gas and oil conglomerate is fighting against an environmental advocacy group that accused Exxon of polluting the air.
ABC News reported that the company had been slapped with a $14.25 million fine after District Judge David Hittner of Houston sided with the group and upheld his first ruling. He initially asked for a $20 million penalty in 2017, but Exxon made an appeal to the court, and the new decision was announced this week. The oil firm is expected to file for another appeal, so the case is likely to drag once again.


Bain Capital Nears Deal for Majority Stake in Volkswagen Marine Engine Unit Everllence
Nike CFO Shake-Up Fuels Concerns Over Turnaround Strategy
Trip.com Shares Tumble After Q1 Profit Drops and Weak Revenue Growth Outlook
WiseTech Global Denies Knowledge of Investigation Into Founder Richard White
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge
Nissan Halts Electric Qashqai Development Amid EV Market Challenges
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices
Anthropic AI Model Uncovers Vulnerabilities in Classified U.S. Government Systems During Security Test
Tencent Reviews Marvelous Stake as Gaming Giant Reassesses Global Investment Strategy
Pelosi Discloses Major Intel and Uber Call Option Purchases Worth Up to $6 Million
KPMG Australia Chairman and Senior Partners Exit Amid Escalating Whistleblower Scandal
Samsung Electronics Stock Surges on Report of Massive $59 Billion Share Buyback Plan
SpaceX Stock Rebounds After Sharp Selloff, But Valuation Concerns Persist
Doncasters Raises $919 Million in NYSE IPO as Aerospace Growth Accelerates
Heineken Names JDE Peet’s CEO Rafael Oliveira as New Chief Executive
SK Hynix Moves Closer to New York ADR Listing Amid AI Chip Boom
Micron Stock Surges on Strong AI Demand, Record Revenue, and Bullish Q4 Forecast 



