There's a 'revolving door' between industry and regulators, but its effects aren't as strong as you think
Athlete activism or corporate woke washing? Getting it right in the age of Black Lives Matter is a tough game
English football: why financial calamity facing clubs is even worse than in mainland Europe
In the German Bundesliga, crowds have returned to stadiums for the 2020/21 football season. Maximum capacity is between 4,600 and 9,300 depending on stadium size, which equates to between 10% and 25% of the norm. France’s Ligue 1 has made similar steps, with small crowds of 1,000 to 5,000 - if localities do not have special restrictions.
Closer to home, it is a different story. There have been a few pilot games with small crowds of a few hundred fans at some English Football League (EFL) grounds, such as when Charlton Athletic hosted Doncaster Rovers in front of about 1,000 fans on September 19, losing 3-1.
But the UK government announcement of new COVID-19 restrictions in late September paused plans to allow fans to partially return to all matches on October 1. Fans probably won’t now return before April 2021.
It is too soon to see from the recent matches across Europe whether the new procedures and social distancing will sufficiently restrict infection rates to persuade the UK government to change its mind. But even if fans could return to UK sport venues, would they? They might be too worried about safety. The pandemic has also triggered a recession, so many fans will be looking hard at their leisure budgets.
As a result of the global financial crisis of 2007-09, attendance figures at EFL matches fell 10%, according my research in progress with Tunde Buraimo, a sports management specialist at the University of Liverpool, and Giuseppe Migali, an economist at Lancaster University. It is hard to predict what will happen this time around, with concerns around travel and the new COVID-proof match “experience” added to the mix. They clearly might affect gates even after the restrictions are lifted.
English football clubs rely heavily on gate receipts for financial viability. Gates made up 36% of Premier League club revenues in 2018/19, while broadcast revenues and other commercial income such as sponsorship contributed 51% and 13% respectively.
Contrast that with the 72-club EFL, representing tiers two to four, where gate receipts make up the dominant share of revenues. There’s also a massive overall difference in income between the leagues, with average Premier League revenues of £258 million per club compared to £33 million for Championship clubs, £8 million in League One and £4 million in League Two.
Even before COVID-19, some lower-league clubs were struggling to continue as payrolls exceeded revenues. Bury FC and Macclesfield Town have been wound up in recent months, while Bolton Wanderers and Wigan Athletic received points deductions for going into administration. Relegations quickly followed.
The EFL has responded with a strict salary cap for teams in the third and fourth tiers. Yet compelling clubs to play games without paying spectators makes things much worse. Their commercial/sponsorship income is also in danger from sponsors such as airlines, travel and leisure companies cutting their own costs during the recession.
The Bundesliga is the only European football league to strike a new TV deal since COVID-19. It previously had a domestic deal for Germany’s top two tiers worth €4.6 billion (£4.2 billion) over four years. The new Sky Deutschland/DAZN four-year deal kicks off in 2021/22 and is worth €4.4 billion. Industry experts and Bundesliga officials are viewing the slight price reduction as a positive result, considering the severity of the pandemic.
All eyes will be on the English Premier League package, which goes out for tender at the end of 2020. Under the existing three-year deal covering 2019-22, which was worth about £4.5 billion, Sky Sports and BT had to make way for Amazon to broadcast a small number of games in the UK for the first time.
Assuming the broadcasters pay comparable amounts in the belief that viewers will keep subscribing, the revenues will help the 20 top-tier clubs partially recoup what they lose from gate receipts and commercial income. To offset this, the clubs are having to pay the broadcasters a £330 million rebate because of all the disruption to matches caused by the pandemic.
As for the EFL clubs, they sell their broadcast rights separately to the Premier League – most recently in the five-year deal worth just £595 million which runs from 2019-24 and focuses mainly on Championship clubs. Notice the difference with Germany, where the top two tiers sell their rights together.
The question for the EFL – not to mention all lower sports leagues – is to what extent they can make up gate losses through increased match streaming. The EFL is off to a promising start with its iFollow streaming service, which began in 2018/19 with coverage of midweek games. It covers most EFL clubs and is accessed via pay-per-view at around £10 per game through club websites. This season, iFollow has expanded into weekend games.
Another unknown is how games will be affected by the lack of fans in stadiums. The evidence suggests it could reduce “home advantage”, giving away teams a better chance of winning. It is certainly the case that the number of games won in the Bundesliga by visiting teams has increased since COVID-19 restrictions began. Other research across Europe suggests that referees are less likely to give decisions to home teams without fans there. The loss of home advantage could make games more attractive to viewers as away teams are more inclined to press for wins.
One other crumb of comfort for sports clubs is that as the recession bites and companies fold, large and cheap locations will become available for stadium developments. But for English lower-league clubs in particular, the future looks bleak unless the government changes tack on the stadium ban or makes other financial support available.
Robert Simmons does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.