Trump Sues BBC for Defamation Over Edited Capitol Riot Speech Clip 
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations 
Federal Judge Orders Restoration of SEVIS Status for Tufts PhD Student Rumeysa Ozturk 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation 
Tunisia Protests Grow as Opposition Unites Against President Kais Saied’s Rule 
Jimmy Lai Convicted Under Hong Kong National Security Law in Landmark Case 
FDA Says No Black Box Warning Planned for COVID-19 Vaccines Despite Safety Debate 
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
Woolworths Faces Fresh Class Action Over Alleged Underpayments, Shares Slide 
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs 
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant 
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market 
SpaceX Begins IPO Preparations as Wall Street Banks Line Up for Advisory Roles 
Brazil Arrests Former Peruvian Foreign Minister Augusto Blacker Miller in International Fraud Case 
Bolsonaro’s Defense Requests Hospital Transfer and Humanitarian House Arrest 
On Thursday, Elon Musk's X, formerly known as Twitter, failed to block a California state law mandating social media companies to disclose their content moderation practices. A judge dismissed X's challenge, highlighting the importance of complying with the First Amendment.
According to Reuters, the content moderation law in California requires social media companies with substantial yearly revenue to publish semi-annual reports detailing their moderation practices. These reports must include data on the number of objectionable posts moderated and the steps taken to address them.
X's Legal Argument
X argues that California's law infringes upon its free speech rights under the First Amendment and the state constitution. However, as per Wion, US District Judge William Shubb stated that while the reporting requirement does impose a significant compliance burden, it is justifiable within the context of First Amendment law.
Judge Shubb also emphasized the importance of "terms of service" requirements for social media platforms, suggesting they play a crucial role. This condition can influence users' decisions and serve as a determining factor when exploring platforms.
The "terms of service requirement" necessitates social media companies to provide contact information for users to seek clarification on their terms of service. Additionally, platforms must outline the process for flagging content and detail their potential actions against objectionable content or users posting it.
Misinformation Challenges
In recent times, amidst the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas in the Middle East, X, like other social media platforms, faced a surge in fake images and misleading information. This situation has added to the pressure on X's moderation rules.
Since Elon Musk acquired X in October 2022, the platform has been scrutinized for its moderation policies. Several prominent advertisers have even paused their advertisements on X due to concerns over these policies.
Photo: Rubaitul Azad/Unsplash
