Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
Union Urges Court to Compel Trump Administration to Restore CFPB Funding 
Momenta Quietly Moves Toward Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising China-U.S. Tensions 
Judge Dismisses Charges Against Comey and Letitia James After Ruling on Prosecutor’s Appointment 
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off 
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban 
Bolsonaro Detained Over Alleged Escape Risk After Ankle Monitor Tampering 
Visa to Move European Headquarters to London’s Canary Wharf 
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies 
Trump Vows Pardon for Former Honduran President as Honduras Faces Tight Election 
Bristol Myers Faces $6.7 Billion Lawsuit After Judge Allows Key Shareholder Claims to Proceed 
Amazon Italy Pays €180M in Compensation as Delivery Staff Probe Ends 
Yellow Corp Reaches Major Settlement With Pension Plans Amid Ongoing Bankruptcy Case 
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp 
Rio Tinto Raises 2025 Copper Output Outlook as Oyu Tolgoi Expansion Accelerates 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
On Thursday, Elon Musk's X, formerly known as Twitter, failed to block a California state law mandating social media companies to disclose their content moderation practices. A judge dismissed X's challenge, highlighting the importance of complying with the First Amendment.
According to Reuters, the content moderation law in California requires social media companies with substantial yearly revenue to publish semi-annual reports detailing their moderation practices. These reports must include data on the number of objectionable posts moderated and the steps taken to address them.
X's Legal Argument
X argues that California's law infringes upon its free speech rights under the First Amendment and the state constitution. However, as per Wion, US District Judge William Shubb stated that while the reporting requirement does impose a significant compliance burden, it is justifiable within the context of First Amendment law.
Judge Shubb also emphasized the importance of "terms of service" requirements for social media platforms, suggesting they play a crucial role. This condition can influence users' decisions and serve as a determining factor when exploring platforms.
The "terms of service requirement" necessitates social media companies to provide contact information for users to seek clarification on their terms of service. Additionally, platforms must outline the process for flagging content and detail their potential actions against objectionable content or users posting it.
Misinformation Challenges
In recent times, amidst the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas in the Middle East, X, like other social media platforms, faced a surge in fake images and misleading information. This situation has added to the pressure on X's moderation rules.
Since Elon Musk acquired X in October 2022, the platform has been scrutinized for its moderation policies. Several prominent advertisers have even paused their advertisements on X due to concerns over these policies.
Photo: Rubaitul Azad/Unsplash
