Evan Gershkovich Says FSB Set Trap for 2023 Russia Arrest 
Germany’s 2026 Growth Outlook Strengthens on Fiscal Spending 
China Cuts Tariffs on U.S. Farm Goods but Excludes Soybeans 
U.S. Stock Futures Fall as Iran, Oil and AI Risks Rattle Markets 
China Consumer Stocks Near Decade Lows as AI Shares Surge 
Najib Razak Granted House Arrest Until 2028 
Almonty Industries Shares Jump 8% After Stifel Sets $25 Target 
Nvidia China Chip Sales Report Sends Chinese Semiconductor Stocks Lower 
Venezuela Nears Deal to Move $4 Billion in Gold to New York Fed 
Meta Found Liable in New Mexico Facebook Data Privacy Case 
Hong Kong Home Prices Stabilize in August After July Decline 
Robinhood Chain Token Ring Allegedly Extracts $18.4 Million Across 53 Launches 
DOJ Will Investigate AI-Related Crimes, Attorney General Blanche Says 
Judge Blocks Trump Rule Limiting Foreign Student Visas 
Oil Surge Pressures Global Stocks as U.S.-Iran Truce Hopes Fade 
OpenAI Agents Access U.S. Government Websites During Testing 
US Court Approves airBaltic Chapter 11 Restructuring 
Add as a preferred source on Google
California has ordered Golden Gate Restaurant Group Inc. to pay $2.2 million in wage theft citations to 230 people who worked at its Burger King stores between 2016 and 2019 .
The corporation, which previously operated six Burger King restaurants in San Francisco, CA, now owes more than $724,000 in unpaid wage, more than $371,000 in interest, and $1.2 million in penalties.
The decision by the California Labor Commissioner’s Office followed the franchise owners’ appeal of a $1.9 million citation originally issued in 2020, which has since accrued interest.
Owners Monu Singh and Harkiran Randhawa are personally being held responsible for the payments.
The former employees claim that Singh and Randhawa knowingly understaffed at least 6 Burger King restaurants under Golden Gate Restaurant Group ownership in an attempt to cut costs. The practices allegedly created unsustainable working conditions for employees, according to the labor commissioner’s investigation.
According to the Labor Commissioner’s Office, the investigation revealed that the violations were not isolated instances that were the fault of rogue supervisors, but part and parcel of a way of operations initiated and/or known by both owners.
