Burger King filed a motion to sanction the lawyers behind a proposed class action lawsuit accusing them of deceiving customers regarding the size of burgers and sandwiches. It argued that its menu images accurately represent the food served.
According to Reuters, Anthony Russo, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, dismissed Burger King's request for sanctions, stating that it lacks merit.
Judge Keeps Majority of Claims Intact, Dismisses TV, Online Ad Claims
Burger King, a subsidiary of Restaurant Brands International, has been battling the case in a Miami federal court for over a year. Law 360 noted that the company has consistently denied allegations that their Whoppers and other offerings are smaller than advertised.
U.S. District Judge Roy Altman recently ruled on the case, maintaining most of the claims while dismissing those of TV and online advertisements. Judge Altman determined that Burger King did not explicitly promise a specific burger size or patty weight that it failed to deliver.
Accusations of Misleading Portrayal of Burger Size
The customers involved in the proposed class action lawsuit argue that Burger King intentionally portrays its burgers with overflowing ingredients that make them appear 35% larger and contain more than double the meat they do. Burger King contends that the food depicted on menu boards is meticulously crafted by trained professionals and photographed under optimal conditions.
The company maintains that the appearance of the food may differ when prepared quickly in a fast-food restaurant and then packaged for takeout. Burger King highlights a similar lawsuit filed by two plaintiffs' lawyers against Wendy's, dismissed in a Brooklyn federal court. This dismissal further supports Burger King's position that the claims lack substance.
Sanction Request Based on Unfounded Complaints
Burger King stresses that the food preparation and presentation for promotional purposes may differ from the final product customers receive.
In its motion for sanctions, Burger King argues that the lawyers' baseless allegations regarding the display of menu item photographs should not be considered unlawful. The company emphasizes that portraying appetizing food images is common in the industry.
Photo: Burger King Newsroom


ANZ Home Loan Applications Drop 12% After Australia Property Tax Changes
Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico
Judge Blocks Trump Mail Voting Order Ahead of 2026 Midterms
SEC Moves to Dismiss Insider Trading Case Against Trump-Pardoned Terren Peizer
FCC Moves to Ban Imports of Foreign Military-Grade Drones Over Security Risks
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal
SMIC Shares Rally as Q2 Profit Surges 262% on Strong Chip Demand
Antofagasta Shares Drop 5% as Miner Cuts 2026 Copper Production Forecast
Warner Bros. Discovery Shares Rise as Newsom Pushes Settlement in $110 Billion Merger Fight
Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Returns to Netflix With Major New Stake
Google Pushes Gemini AI Overhaul as Sergey Brin Targets Model Supremacy
Apple Develops China-Specific AI Model With Alibaba as Apple Intelligence Launch Nears
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Bid to Reinstate $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
US Supreme Court Lets $655.5 Million Judgment Against Palestinian Authorities Stand During Appeal
25 Democratic-Led States Sue Trump Administration Over New Global Tariffs
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts
New Mexico Sues DOJ Over Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein Files Amid Ongoing Investigation 



