UK Employers Plan Moderate Pay Rises as Inflation Pressures Ease but Persist 
China Factory Activity Slips in January as Weak Demand Weighs on Growth Outlook 
U.S.–Venezuela Relations Show Signs of Thaw as Top Envoy Visits Caracas 
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors 
Publishers Seek to Join Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged AI Copyright Infringement 
Trump Threatens Aircraft Tariffs as U.S.-Canada Jet Certification Dispute Escalates 
Japan Election Poll Signals Landslide Win for Sanae Takaichi, Raising Fiscal Policy Concerns 
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines 
Using the Economic Calendar to Reduce Surprise Driven Losses in Forex 
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 
U.S. Eases Venezuela Oil Sanctions to Boost American Investment After Maduro Ouster 
SpaceX Reports $8 Billion Profit as IPO Plans and Starlink Growth Fuel Valuation Buzz 
Nvidia Confirms Major OpenAI Investment Amid AI Funding Race 
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 
Pentagon and Anthropic Clash Over AI Safeguards in National Security Use 
Broadcom Inc. faces a $14.3 million penalty from South Korea's regulator over allegations of unfair business practices towards Samsung Electronics. The firm is poised to appeal in the Seoul High Court.
Expressing disappointment in a statement, the U.S. wireless chipmaker intended to appeal the case to the Seoul High Court, citing disagreement with the Fair Trade Commission's (FTC) ruling. According to the FTC, Broadcom resorted to unlawful tactics, leveraging its market dominance to force Samsung into signing a long-term agreement in 2020. These tactics included cutting off supply and technical support.
Under the agreement, Samsung Electronics was compelled by Broadcom to procure smartphone parts worth $760 million annually from 2021 to 2023. Additionally, Samsung was obligated to compensate for any purchasing amount shortfall below the agreed sum.
In its statement, Broadcom asserted its commitment to conducting business fairly and lawfully, emphasizing its significant contributions to the innovation and success of the Korean economy and its partnership with major Korean technology organizations.
Furthermore, Broadcom highlighted its collaboration with the KFTC (Korea Fair Trade Commission) staff, aiming to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial outcome for all involved parties. Despite these efforts, the FTC rejected Broadcom's proposal in June to voluntarily rectify its unfair business practices, offering a sum of 20 billion won.
The regulator reasoned that the proposed correction fell short of a suitable measure to restore the fair trade order and safeguard the interests of other industry players.
Broadcom's decision to seek an appeal signifies its willingness to challenge the ruling and defend its actions. As the legal battle unfolds in the Seoul High Court, the outcome will play a pivotal role in determining the implications for both Broadcom and Samsung.
It remains to be seen how this appeal will shape the landscape of trade practices in South Korea and the tech industry. With the fine imposed on Broadcom, the regulator has taken a firm stance against unfair business tactics, highlighting its commitment to maintaining a fair trade order.
As the legal proceedings progress, industry observers keenly await the ultimate decision of the Seoul High Court, which will have far-reaching ramifications on the business practices and competition within the Korean technology market.
Photo: Brooke Cagle/Unsplash
