Broadcom Inc. faces a $14.3 million penalty from South Korea's regulator over allegations of unfair business practices towards Samsung Electronics. The firm is poised to appeal in the Seoul High Court.
Expressing disappointment in a statement, the U.S. wireless chipmaker intended to appeal the case to the Seoul High Court, citing disagreement with the Fair Trade Commission's (FTC) ruling. According to the FTC, Broadcom resorted to unlawful tactics, leveraging its market dominance to force Samsung into signing a long-term agreement in 2020. These tactics included cutting off supply and technical support.
Under the agreement, Samsung Electronics was compelled by Broadcom to procure smartphone parts worth $760 million annually from 2021 to 2023. Additionally, Samsung was obligated to compensate for any purchasing amount shortfall below the agreed sum.
In its statement, Broadcom asserted its commitment to conducting business fairly and lawfully, emphasizing its significant contributions to the innovation and success of the Korean economy and its partnership with major Korean technology organizations.
Furthermore, Broadcom highlighted its collaboration with the KFTC (Korea Fair Trade Commission) staff, aiming to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial outcome for all involved parties. Despite these efforts, the FTC rejected Broadcom's proposal in June to voluntarily rectify its unfair business practices, offering a sum of 20 billion won.
The regulator reasoned that the proposed correction fell short of a suitable measure to restore the fair trade order and safeguard the interests of other industry players.
Broadcom's decision to seek an appeal signifies its willingness to challenge the ruling and defend its actions. As the legal battle unfolds in the Seoul High Court, the outcome will play a pivotal role in determining the implications for both Broadcom and Samsung.
It remains to be seen how this appeal will shape the landscape of trade practices in South Korea and the tech industry. With the fine imposed on Broadcom, the regulator has taken a firm stance against unfair business tactics, highlighting its commitment to maintaining a fair trade order.
As the legal proceedings progress, industry observers keenly await the ultimate decision of the Seoul High Court, which will have far-reaching ramifications on the business practices and competition within the Korean technology market.
Photo: Brooke Cagle/Unsplash


Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House 



