UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
Asian Currencies Steady as Rupee Hits Record Low Amid Fed Rate Cut Bets 
Intel Rejects TSMC’s Allegations of Trade-Secret Leaks as Legal Battle Escalates 
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp 
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO 
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban 
IKEA Launches First New Zealand Store, Marking Expansion Into Its 64th Global Market 
U.S. Backs Bayer in Supreme Court Battle Over Roundup Cancer Lawsuits 
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off 
European Stocks Rise as Markets Await Key U.S. Inflation Data 
IMF Deputy Dan Katz Visits China as Key Economic Review Nears 
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
Michael Dell Pledges $6.25 Billion to Boost Children’s Investment Accounts Under Trump Initiative 
Broadcom Inc. faces a $14.3 million penalty from South Korea's regulator over allegations of unfair business practices towards Samsung Electronics. The firm is poised to appeal in the Seoul High Court.
Expressing disappointment in a statement, the U.S. wireless chipmaker intended to appeal the case to the Seoul High Court, citing disagreement with the Fair Trade Commission's (FTC) ruling. According to the FTC, Broadcom resorted to unlawful tactics, leveraging its market dominance to force Samsung into signing a long-term agreement in 2020. These tactics included cutting off supply and technical support.
Under the agreement, Samsung Electronics was compelled by Broadcom to procure smartphone parts worth $760 million annually from 2021 to 2023. Additionally, Samsung was obligated to compensate for any purchasing amount shortfall below the agreed sum.
In its statement, Broadcom asserted its commitment to conducting business fairly and lawfully, emphasizing its significant contributions to the innovation and success of the Korean economy and its partnership with major Korean technology organizations.
Furthermore, Broadcom highlighted its collaboration with the KFTC (Korea Fair Trade Commission) staff, aiming to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial outcome for all involved parties. Despite these efforts, the FTC rejected Broadcom's proposal in June to voluntarily rectify its unfair business practices, offering a sum of 20 billion won.
The regulator reasoned that the proposed correction fell short of a suitable measure to restore the fair trade order and safeguard the interests of other industry players.
Broadcom's decision to seek an appeal signifies its willingness to challenge the ruling and defend its actions. As the legal battle unfolds in the Seoul High Court, the outcome will play a pivotal role in determining the implications for both Broadcom and Samsung.
It remains to be seen how this appeal will shape the landscape of trade practices in South Korea and the tech industry. With the fine imposed on Broadcom, the regulator has taken a firm stance against unfair business tactics, highlighting its commitment to maintaining a fair trade order.
As the legal proceedings progress, industry observers keenly await the ultimate decision of the Seoul High Court, which will have far-reaching ramifications on the business practices and competition within the Korean technology market.
Photo: Brooke Cagle/Unsplash
