Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs 
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise 
International Outcry Grows Over Re-Arrest of Nobel Laureate Narges Mohammadi in Iran 
Tunisia Protests Grow as Opposition Unites Against President Kais Saied’s Rule 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters 
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs 
Federal Judge Orders Restoration of SEVIS Status for Tufts PhD Student Rumeysa Ozturk 
California, 18 States Sue to Block Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee 
ADB Approves $400 Million Loan to Boost Ease of Doing Business in the Philippines 
Samsung SDI Secures Major LFP Battery Supply Deal in the U.S. 
Honduras Issues International Arrest Warrant for Ex-President Juan Orlando Hernández After U.S. Pardon 
Supreme Court to Weigh Trump’s Power to Remove FTC Commissioner 
U.S. Justice Department Orders Intensified Probe Into Antifa and Domestic Extremist Groups 
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant 
Bolsonaro’s Defense Requests Hospital Transfer and Humanitarian House Arrest 
Trump’s Approval of AI Chip Sales to China Triggers Bipartisan National Security Concerns 
Apple has been ordered to pay $502 million to Texas-based Optis Cellular Technology LLC for using 4G-related patents in its iPhones and iPads, following a ruling by London’s Court of Appeal on Thursday. The decision marks the latest development in a years-long legal battle over standard-essential patents and fair licensing terms.
The dispute began in 2019 when Optis sued Apple in London, claiming the tech giant used its patents—essential to 4G wireless standards—without proper licensing. In 2023, London’s High Court initially awarded Optis $56.43 million plus interest for Apple’s past and future patent use. However, Optis challenged the amount, arguing it undervalued the global license Apple obtained.
In a partially redacted judgment, the appeals court sided with Optis, stating that Apple must pay a lump sum of $502 million, excluding interest, for the 2013–2027 licensing period. The ruling applies to a global license covering Optis’ portfolio of standard-essential patents.
An Apple spokesperson expressed disappointment and confirmed plans to appeal the decision. “Optis makes no products and their sole business is to sue companies using patents they buy,” the spokesperson said, accusing the company of seeking excessive compensation.
Optis, a non-practicing entity, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The case centers around the interpretation of FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) terms, which are supposed to govern licensing of essential technology patents.
The ruling could have broader implications for how multinational companies negotiate patent licenses and defend against litigation from firms that acquire patents solely for enforcement purposes. Apple has faced similar lawsuits globally, as regulators and courts continue to shape the boundaries of FRAND licensing in the tech industry.
