Amazon was declared the winner in a tax legal battle where the EU ordered it to pay Luxembourg the amount of €250 million or around $303 million in back taxes. The win for the American retail giant is said to be a big blow to European Commissioner Margrethe Vestager's campaign against preferential deals.
Why Amazon was favored in the court
As per Reuters, the hitch, which is Amazon’s win in the tax case, triggered renewed calls from EU lawmakers for a global corporate tax deal. Despite losing, analysts said that Vestager is not likely to give up on her crusade regarding the amount of tax that big companies should pay.
In any case, based on the EU’s court ruling, Amazon won in the legal dispute after the group of legislators was not able to show that Luxembourg gave Jeff Bezos’ company a special treatment that violates state aid rules.
"The Commission did not prove to the requisite legal standard that there was an undue reduction of the tax burden of a European subsidiary of the Amazon group," the EU judges stated in the ruling.
This legal dispute stemmed from the order that Amazon received in 2017. The European Commission ordered the American e-commerce and tech firm to pay €250 million to Luxembourg for back taxes.
Second loss for EU tax crusaders
It was mentioned that this is the second defeat for Vestager as it also lost in the court tussle against Apple last year. At that time, the American tech company contested an EU order for it to pay €13 billion or $15 billion in Irish back taxes.
Similar to Amazon’s case, the EU’s court ruled that the commission failed to prove that the Irish government had granted a tax advantage to Apple. The European Commission has since filed an appeal against the ruling in the iPhone maker tax dispute.
Apple and Amazon were said to be targeted by Vestager in the EU's campaign to put an end to tax agreement practices being used by EU states to attract major companies. The group said that such types of deals are not fair.
Meanwhile, Amazon said in a statement that it welcomed the judges’ decision. The company added that it has always been Amazon’s stance to follow all applicable laws and reiterated that it has not received any preferential or special treatment in its dealings.


Japan Manufacturing Growth Accelerates in June as Orders Surge Despite Iran War Cost Pressures
Asian Stocks Slide as AI Rally Pauses, South Korean Chipmakers Lead Regional Decline
California Drivers Sue BP, Walmart, 7-Eleven Over Alleged AI Gas Price Fixing
Gold Prices Mixed as Stronger Dollar Offsets Safe-Haven Demand Amid U.S.-Iran Peace Talks
US Dollar Climbs to One-Year High as Fed Rate Hike Expectations Surge
NTSB Investigates Boston Logan Airport Near-Miss Between Delta and American Airlines Jets
Nike CFO Shake-Up Fuels Concerns Over Turnaround Strategy
SpaceX Stock Plunges 16% as KeyBanc Warns Valuation May Be Overstretched
Bain Capital Nears Deal for Majority Stake in Volkswagen Marine Engine Unit Everllence
South Korea Remains MSCI Emerging Market Despite Reform Progress
South Korea’s KOSPI Rebounds as Samsung and SK Hynix Lead Tech Stock Recovery
New Zealand Fast-Tracks Gold Mining as Industry Revival Gains Momentum
Oil Prices Drop as Strait of Hormuz Shipping Recovers
U.S.-Iran Diplomacy Helps Drive Gasoline Prices Down 15% From May Highs
Pelosi Discloses Major Intel and Uber Call Option Purchases Worth Up to $6 Million
Meta Pauses Employee Activity Tracking Program Over Data Security Concerns
Meta Reportedly Developing ‘Arena’ Prediction Market App to Rival Polymarket and Kalshi 



