Amazon was declared the winner in a tax legal battle where the EU ordered it to pay Luxembourg the amount of €250 million or around $303 million in back taxes. The win for the American retail giant is said to be a big blow to European Commissioner Margrethe Vestager's campaign against preferential deals.
Why Amazon was favored in the court
As per Reuters, the hitch, which is Amazon’s win in the tax case, triggered renewed calls from EU lawmakers for a global corporate tax deal. Despite losing, analysts said that Vestager is not likely to give up on her crusade regarding the amount of tax that big companies should pay.
In any case, based on the EU’s court ruling, Amazon won in the legal dispute after the group of legislators was not able to show that Luxembourg gave Jeff Bezos’ company a special treatment that violates state aid rules.
"The Commission did not prove to the requisite legal standard that there was an undue reduction of the tax burden of a European subsidiary of the Amazon group," the EU judges stated in the ruling.
This legal dispute stemmed from the order that Amazon received in 2017. The European Commission ordered the American e-commerce and tech firm to pay €250 million to Luxembourg for back taxes.
Second loss for EU tax crusaders
It was mentioned that this is the second defeat for Vestager as it also lost in the court tussle against Apple last year. At that time, the American tech company contested an EU order for it to pay €13 billion or $15 billion in Irish back taxes.
Similar to Amazon’s case, the EU’s court ruled that the commission failed to prove that the Irish government had granted a tax advantage to Apple. The European Commission has since filed an appeal against the ruling in the iPhone maker tax dispute.
Apple and Amazon were said to be targeted by Vestager in the EU's campaign to put an end to tax agreement practices being used by EU states to attract major companies. The group said that such types of deals are not fair.
Meanwhile, Amazon said in a statement that it welcomed the judges’ decision. The company added that it has always been Amazon’s stance to follow all applicable laws and reiterated that it has not received any preferential or special treatment in its dealings.


Petrobras Joins Brazil Diesel Subsidy Program
McDonald’s Sees Flat Traffic, Sticky Inflation as New Normal
China’s ‘Lipstick King’ Says AI Won’t Replace Livestream Hosts
US Northeast Airports Resume Operations After Telecom Outage Disrupts Thousands of Flights
Yen Weakens as Dollar Gains on Widening US-Japan Rate Gap
SpaceX Nasdaq 100 Weight to More Than Double in Rebalance
Meta Connect Spotlights Camera-Free Smart Glasses Amid Privacy Concerns
Wall Street Falls as Treasury Yields Surge, Oil Rebounds on Iran Tensions
Oil Prices Rise as U.S.-Iran Talks Fuel Diplomacy Hopes
Anthropic’s Claude Discovers CRISPR-Like Enzyme System
China Vanke Shares Jump as Beijing Moves to Ease Debt Pressure
Paramount Skydance Faces $30 Million Film Penalty in Warner Bros. Deal
SoftBank Launches $11 Billion Bond Sale to Fund OpenAI Investment
US, Japan and South Korea Back Taiwan Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit
Dollar Hits Two-Month High as Fed Rate Hike Bets Rise 



