Galp Shares Fall After Q2 EBITDA Miss Despite Profit Beat and Higher Dividend 
Exosens H1 Profit Beats Forecasts as Defense Demand Drives Growth 
Nvidia Invests $1 Billion in Naver as South Korea AI Data Center Expansion Gains Momentum 
GSK Unveils $2.52 Billion Cost-Cutting Plan to Accelerate Drug Pipeline 
Tech Stock Positioning Nears Neutral as Investor Rotation Enters Final Phase, Deutsche Bank Says 
Rio Tinto Stock Jumps as Strong Earnings, Higher Dividend and AI Metal Demand Boost Outlook 
Unilever Raises 2026 Sales Outlook After Strong Q2 Volume Growth 
Nvidia Eyes $250B Guarantee for OpenAI’s Massive Ohio AI Data Center Project 
X Challenges Australia’s Expanded Social Media Ban Enforcement Powers 
Serica Energy to Acquire Pharos Energy for £145.7M, Sending PHARP Shares Soaring 
TeamViewer Shares Fall Despite Profit Growth as ARR and Customer Base Decline 
Stellantis Sells Free2move Car-Sharing Business to Mutares to Strengthen Core Auto Strategy 
TSMC Gradually Restarts Japan Chip Plant After Kumamoto Earthquake 
Zhongji Innolight Raises $6.8 Billion in Hong Kong IPO as AI Demand Fuels Growth 
Johnson & Johnson Proposes $5.5 Billion Talc Settlement to Resolve U.S. Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits 
Standard Chartered Beats Profit Forecasts as First-Half Earnings Rise 9% 
Seagate Stock Jumps as AI-Fueled Earnings Beat and Strong FY2027 Outlook Impress Investors 
The US Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google LLC for unlawfully monopolizing online search services to harm competitors and consumers.
According to the Justice Department, the move was for restoring competition and encouraging innovation.
Google described the lawsuit as "deeply flawed" and "would do nothing to help consumers."
The company pointed out it was the people who chose to use Google and are not forced into it or due to a lack of alternatives.
It warned that the government's move would result in artificially propping up lower-quality search alternatives to the detriment of the users.
But the justice department said that Google has entered into "a series of exclusionary agreements" that collectively lock up the primary avenues through which users access search engines.
It added that the result was that no once could feasibly challenge Google's dominance in search and search advertising, harming users, advertisers, and small businesses in the form of fewer choices, higher advertising prices, reduced quality, and less innovation.
