Some Australian private schools have reported lower interest from prospective parents due to the financial pressures of COVID-19.
A number of Victorian school principals have also called on the state government to re-open borders to international students. They say there’s a possibility schools may be forced to close, due to severe financial distress from the non-return of students.
But the cause of the problem may lie not so much in COVID border closures but in fragile business and financial models adopted by some schools.
It was getting worse before COVID
Some schools with large boarding communities, including The King’s School and St Joseph’s College in Sydney, have accessed JobKeeper payments as their income met the 30% downturn threshold, while their total income is fewer than A$1 billion. These schools enrol large numbers of regional and rural students, as well as international students.
The last few years have also seen a steady increase in weekly boarders — who come from families for whom juggling work and study is facilitated by boarding, even when they live in relative proximity to the school.
The costs associated with running these residential facilities is significant, so it’s unsurprising the loss of boarding income for these schools is acute.
The loss of international student enrolments for most schools, though, is unlikely to cause many of these schools to reach the 30% downturn threshold. The Australian Boarding Schools’ Association notes only 10% of its 21,000 residential students are from overseas. With these smaller numbers, some principals now find themselves with an increasingly stressed financial situation and little direct support.
And international school enrolments flatlined over the period 2016-2019, even as the higher education and vocational education sectors increased by more than 30% across the same period.
Independent Schools Australia, the peak advocacy body for schools where most international students enrol, also notes while overall international education enrolments increased by 9.7% in 2019 from the year before, international student enrolments in non-government schools declined by 4.7% in the same period.
The case for government intervention due to COVID weakens somewhat in light of these data.
Some private schools need to rethink their models
Parental choice — often the preferred ground of legitimacy for non-government schools — may also require some principals to rethink the sustainability of their models. International enrolments are not subsidised by the Australian government and their fees can be very high compared to domestic students. For example, Wesley College in Melbourne charges A$42,850 for international students in Years 9 to 12 (not including the additional $27,000 for boarding), while domestic students in Year 10 to 12 are charged $34,610.
A reduction of this income can have a significant and material impact on school operations. When parents cannot afford the fees, they will shift their child’s enrolment to a school with more sustainable fee levels.
When school enrolments deteriorate, there is significant human cost to teachers, administration and support staff. That loss, while painful for those directly impacted, could be a gain for other schools in both government and non-government sectors.
As enrolments drift elsewhere, so too does the need to increase staffing in those schools to accommodate additional enrolments. The data above suggest solutions will need to emerge from within the schools themselves as they did post-GFC, rather than from government.
The non-government school sector has long benefited from the marketisation of education in Australia. The challenge now is how some schools will reconfigure their operations in light of these changing circumstances. If they do not, or cannot, the future looks quite dire.
The rapid growth of UK independent school partnerships in China is also providing an increasing range of options for parents seeking international education experience.
Some private schools will likely need to adjust their staffing levels as their enrolments change; if they can do so successfully, their future may be more secure, if not quite the future those school communities and principals may have envisaged.
Such is the logic of market-driven policy.


Cybersecurity Stocks Tumble After Anthropic's Claude Mythos AI Leak Sparks Market Fears
Brazil Meat Exports Weather Iran War Disruptions With Rerouted Shipments
Trump Administration Plans 100% Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports
CTOC Adds 3,000 Doctors, 500 Hospitals Ahead of Liquidity Push
RBC Capital: European Medtech Firms Show Minimal Middle East and Energy Risk Exposure
Russell 1000 Companies Hit $2.2T Cash Record While Aggressively Reinvesting in Growth
Eli Lilly and Insilico Medicine Forge $2.75 Billion AI-Driven Drug Discovery Deal
TSMC Japan's Second Fab to Produce 3nm Chips by 2028
Apple Turns 50: From Garage Startup to AI Crossroads
Ukrainian Drones and the #MadeByHousewives Movement: Kyiv Fires Back at Rheinmetall CEO
Bank of America's $72.5M Epstein Settlement: What You Need to Know
Luxury Car Sales in the Middle East Take a Hit Amid Iran War
Annie Altman Amends Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman
Nike Beats Q3 Estimates but China Weakness and Margin Pressure Weigh on Outlook
Europe's Aviation Sector on Track to Meet 2025 Green Fuel Mandate
SoftwareONE Posts 22.5% Revenue Surge in 2025 on Crayon Acquisition
Fonterra Admits Anchor Butter "Grass-Fed" Label Misled Consumers After Greenpeace Lawsuit 



