Deepfakes are still new, but 2024 could be the year they have an impact on elections 
The yen plunges to 34-year low despite interest rate hike 
Why the government’s haste in changing the health system could come back to haunt it 
US Finalizes Ban List for Chinese Chipmakers; Boosts Mexico Semiconductor Ties 
The stakes could not be higher as Canada sets its 2035 emissions target 
With nominations decided, Trump leads Biden in US polls 
US and Japan Boost AI, Semiconductor Alliance; EU Eyes Reduction in China Dependence 
SpaceX Builds Spy Satellites for US; Russia Warns of Military Response 
The rising flood of space junk is a risk to us on Earth – and governments are on the hook 
Low pay and few contracts make freelance journalism a bleak prospect in 2024 
How India’s economy has fared under ten years of Narendra Modi 
London Marathon: how visually impaired people run 
Video games at work? It sounds fun, but there are ethical risks 
Senate crossbencher Nick Xenophon will defy the requirement to provide his name when he fills out Tuesday’s census.
With controversy surrounding the extension of the retention of names from 18 months to four years, Xenophon wants to prompt a test case on the validity of the requirement.
He faces prosecution and a cumulative fine of A$180 a day.
Xenophon said the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) had failed to make a compelling case for people having to provide names and these to be stored for four years.
“And unlike any other census in this nation’s history … all names will be turned into a code that ultimately can be used to identify you,” he said.
“It seems, rather than being a snapshot of the nation, the census will now morph into a mobile CCTV that follows every Australian.”
He said there had been a woeful consultation process that wasn’t just not transparent but some would say “verged on the disingenuous”.
Xenophon noted former ABS head Bill McLennan – to whom he had spoken – had expressed concerns about the unnecessary intrusion into privacy.
The NSW privacy commissioner, Elizabeth Coombs, had highlighted risks and “also pointed out what I fear – that the mandatory requirement for providing your name, and the way it will be stored and used will be completely counter-productive” in that it would undermine trust that millions of Australian have had in the census, Xenophon said.
Coombs had warned people might lie on their form because they feared their data could be misused.
Xenophon said he would contest any notice he received to comply by providing his name “and by doing so it will in effect turn into a test case of the validity of this request”.
He would also try to get legal amendments so people who did not provide their name could not be prosecuted. He will seek the support of both Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten as well crossbenchers for the change, which would need to be retrospective to census night.
Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.
Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
