Implicit transaction costs (ITCs) are not directly visible but may be a material drag on investors’ return. This note aims to measure and identify ITC drivers, which can have implications for trading strategies. For agency trades, we calculate a volume-weighted average effective spread (VWAES) as a proxy for ITCs.
Based on reported transactions involving 62 European-listed ETFs between Jan 2015 and Dec 2016, we show that VWAES primarily depend on market conditions and intraday trading times – they may be wider if trades are executed at market open or during volatile trading sessions - but also vary by ETF, driven by the commercial and marketing strategies of ETF providers. For non-agency trades, ITCs are difficult to estimate due to lack of public data.
However, we explain that ITCs may be low if the requested ETF positions are held in market makers’ inventories. If not, ITCs can be broken down into hedging costs and creation & redemption fees and ultimately depend on ETFs’ underlying exposures and market conditions.


FxWirePro: BTC/USD Forecast Signals Macro Bull Expansion Toward $200K+ Following 800 EMA Reclaim
MSTR Stock Rises 3% as Strategy Challenges MSCI Bitcoin Stance
Michael Saylor Sees Strategy, Strive Expanding Bitcoin Credit Market
STX.CITY Melts the Charts": Crypto Category Heat Map Shows Bitcoin L2 Mania Leading the Pack
Cardano Price Struggles as NIGHT Token Surges 20%
Evernorth Set for Nasdaq Debut With 473 Million XRP Treasury
Coinbase, Visa Back Open USD Stablecoin Launch
Ethereum Price Eyes $3,000 as Fed Rate Hike Odds Drop
Citi Raises Bitcoin Price Target to $113,000 on ETF Optimism
Hyperliquid Sets $856 Million HYPE Token Unlock for October
Goldman Sachs Names CATL, Zenergy Top China Battery Picks
XRP Ledger Hits 10 Million AI Payments as Bitcoin Retreats 



