The U.S. Justice Department has formally asked a New York federal judge to reject a request by two bipartisan lawmakers seeking court oversight of the public release of records related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The request centers on whether an independent special master should be appointed to monitor the Justice Department’s handling of Epstein-related documents.
Since December, the Department of Justice has been releasing large volumes of records tied to its investigations into Epstein and his associates. However, U.S. Representatives Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, and Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, have criticized what they describe as an excessively slow and incomplete disclosure process. They argue that the DOJ has failed to fully comply with a federal law requiring the release of all Epstein-related records by December 19.
Last week, Khanna and Massie asked U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer to allow them to file an amicus brief, or “friend of the court” submission. Their proposed filing would urge the court to appoint a special master and independent monitor to oversee the release of the remaining documents, citing the public interest and transparency concerns surrounding the Epstein case.
In response, the Justice Department pushed back strongly. In a six-page letter filed Friday with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche argued that the lawmakers lack legal standing. The DOJ maintained that Khanna and Massie are not parties to U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell and therefore have no right to intervene in the case. The letter, signed by Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, stated that the lawmakers’ objectives are inconsistent with the role of an amicus and that the court lacks authority to grant the relief they seek.
Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein associate, is currently serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls. The DOJ has said that as of late 2025, approximately 5.2 million pages of Epstein-related records remain under review. The department estimates it needs around 400 lawyers from multiple offices to complete the review process, which is expected to continue through late January.
The dispute highlights ongoing tensions between lawmakers and the Justice Department over transparency, accountability, and the handling of one of the most high-profile criminal investigations in recent U.S. history.


Federal Appeals Court Allows Texas SB4 Immigration Law Enforcement to Proceed
Judge Rules DOGE Humanities Grant Cuts Unconstitutional
Trump, Xi Begin High-Stakes China Summit Focused on Trade, Taiwan and Global Tensions
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice
US Plans Imminent Indictment of Cuba’s Raul Castro Over 1996 Plane Shootdown
Pentagon Halts Planned U.S. Troop Deployment to Poland Amid Europe Force Review
Matthew Wale Elected Solomon Islands Prime Minister After No-Confidence Vote
Elon Musk’s China Influence Faces New Challenges Amid Rising EV Competition
Nike Tariff Refund Lawsuit Sparks Consumer Backlash Over Price Increases
US Expects China to Boost Purchases of American Farm Products After Trump-Xi Summit
Trump DOJ Accuses Yale Medical School of Racial Bias in Admissions
Macron Faces Political Test Over Bank of France Nomination Ahead of 2027 Election
Coles “Down Down” Ruling Sparks Fresh Scrutiny of Australian Supermarket Pricing
US Hosts Israel-Lebanon Talks as Ceasefire Deadline Nears
Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha Denies U.S. Cartel Allegations, Calls Charges Political
Starmer Faces Leadership Crisis as Wes Streeting Reportedly Considers Challenge 



