The U.S. Justice Department has formally asked a New York federal judge to reject a request by two bipartisan lawmakers seeking court oversight of the public release of records related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The request centers on whether an independent special master should be appointed to monitor the Justice Department’s handling of Epstein-related documents.
Since December, the Department of Justice has been releasing large volumes of records tied to its investigations into Epstein and his associates. However, U.S. Representatives Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, and Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, have criticized what they describe as an excessively slow and incomplete disclosure process. They argue that the DOJ has failed to fully comply with a federal law requiring the release of all Epstein-related records by December 19.
Last week, Khanna and Massie asked U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer to allow them to file an amicus brief, or “friend of the court” submission. Their proposed filing would urge the court to appoint a special master and independent monitor to oversee the release of the remaining documents, citing the public interest and transparency concerns surrounding the Epstein case.
In response, the Justice Department pushed back strongly. In a six-page letter filed Friday with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche argued that the lawmakers lack legal standing. The DOJ maintained that Khanna and Massie are not parties to U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell and therefore have no right to intervene in the case. The letter, signed by Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, stated that the lawmakers’ objectives are inconsistent with the role of an amicus and that the court lacks authority to grant the relief they seek.
Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein associate, is currently serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls. The DOJ has said that as of late 2025, approximately 5.2 million pages of Epstein-related records remain under review. The department estimates it needs around 400 lawyers from multiple offices to complete the review process, which is expected to continue through late January.
The dispute highlights ongoing tensions between lawmakers and the Justice Department over transparency, accountability, and the handling of one of the most high-profile criminal investigations in recent U.S. history.


CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
Federal Reserve Faces Subpoena Delay Amid Investigation Into Chair Jerome Powell
Bosnian Serb Presidential Rerun Confirms Victory for Dodik Ally Amid Allegations of Irregularities
Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding
Nicaragua Ends Visa-Free Entry for Cubans, Disrupting Key Migration Route to the U.S.
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
Netanyahu to Meet Trump in Washington as Iran Nuclear Talks Intensify
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue
Trump Administration Appeals Court Order to Release Hudson Tunnel Project Funding 



