Meta Agrees to $18 Billion Settlement, Tightens Teen Social Media Rules 
US, Japan and South Korea Back Taiwan Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit 
Judge Rejects Minnesota Bid to Force ICE Agent Extradition 
SEC Seeks ISS Client Voting Records in Proxy Adviser Probe 
US Plans Two New Military Bases in Greenland Under Arctic Deal 
Australia Defends Social Media Algorithm Law Amid US Concerns 
US Northeast Airports Resume Operations After Telecom Outage Disrupts Thousands of Flights 
CNN, MS NOW and Politico Sue Trump Over White House Media Ban 
Australia Plans New Rules Giving Users Control Over Social Media Feeds 
Trump Sets High-Stakes UN Meetings With Zelenskiy, Gulf Leaders 
Ecuador Court Convicts Ex-President Lenin Moreno in Bribery Case 
Canada Unveils Bill to Fast-Track Major Resource Projects 
Russian Drone Attacks Kill Four in Kyiv Region, Including Three Children 
FDA Names Permanent Drug and Biologics Center Chiefs 
Trump Administration Prepares Sanctions Against Entire ICC 
Paramount Skydance Faces $30 Million Film Penalty in Warner Bros. Deal 
Add as a preferred source on Google
A U.S. appeals court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue enforcing its ban on transgender individuals seeking to enlist in the military while ongoing legal challenges proceed. However, the court also blocked the government from removing currently serving transgender military personnel, marking a significant development in the debate over transgender rights in the armed forces.
In a 2-1 decision issued Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined that the Pentagon can maintain restrictions on new transgender recruits due to its broad authority to establish military enlistment standards. At the same time, the court concluded that forcing active transgender service members out of the military would cause far greater harm than delaying entry for prospective recruits.
Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins, appointed by former President Barack Obama, wrote that ending an established military career would impose a more severe hardship than postponing the start of one. The ruling partially supports an earlier federal court decision that had blocked the entire policy from taking effect.
The case stems from a January 2025 executive order signed by President Donald Trump, which argued that adopting a transgender identity conflicts with military values and readiness. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later implemented the order, prompting legal action from transgender service members and advocacy organizations.
LGBTQ rights group GLAD Law, representing the plaintiffs, welcomed the decision. Attorney Jennifer Levi stated that the ruling confirms there is no legitimate justification for dismissing transgender troops who have consistently met military standards and demonstrated their commitment to service.
Judge Justin Walker, a Trump appointee, dissented, arguing that courts lack the expertise and authority to determine military personnel policies.
The decision follows a May 2025 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allowed the transgender military policy to take effect in a separate case. While the Supreme Court did not provide detailed reasoning, the D.C. Circuit noted that the ruling may have been based on procedural considerations rather than the policy’s legality.
The dispute is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to roll back federal recognition and accommodations for transgender individuals. The U.S. military currently has approximately 1.3 million active-duty personnel, with estimates placing the number of transgender service members in the thousands.
